Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+BRHS\s+TOPICS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+BRHS\s+TOPICS\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] BRHS TOPICS (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <dave_lotz@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:37:06 -0600; CBQ listers, As I?ve clearly stated in the past, the CBQ list is no longer a place for BRHS discussions. Anything having to do with the BRHS needs to go to the BRHSlist. In light of recent events, th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00020.html (8,976 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] BRHS TOPICS (score: 1): Author: "Haydens" <kliner@socket.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:25:30 -0600; Dave, I agree with your posting and after close examination, I believe Brother Ray was the guilty party when he uttered that four lettered word "BULL". However, I would hope we could continue this th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00022.html (9,702 bytes)
3. RE: [CBQ] BRHS TOPICS (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <dave_lotz@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:03:37 -0600; Hi Archie, et. al., No, the recent events I mention have nothing to do with Brother Ray?s use of the word ?bull.? It has to do with conversations regarding the BRHS, which are no longer allowed on th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00024.html (11,272 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] BRHS TOPICS (score: 1): Author: "John Lee" <BNJohn@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:07:02 -0600; Brother Archie, I agree 100%, brother Ray is a long time member of this list in good standing and is entitled to a mistake or two, we will most definitely welcome him back with open arms. As for the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00025.html (11,056 bytes)
5. Re: [CBQ] BRHS TOPICS (score: 1): Author: Rob Adams <steamera@netins.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:18:59 -0600; Dave; I too, was confused by your message, as it seemed to me that everyone has been behaving rather well. So shall we take it to be a sort of prophylaxis, like the antibiotics given out at the hint; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00026.html (13,174 bytes)
6. RE: [CBQ] BRHS TOPICS (score: 1): Author: "Dave Lotz" <dave_lotz@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:53:34 -0600; Rob, Yep, that's what it is...a gentle reminder that there is a separation of BRHS topics and CB&Q topics. Dave Dave; I too, was confused by your message, as it seemed to me that everyone has been be; /archives/BRHSLIST/2005-02/msg00027.html (9,751 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]