Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+3\s+Amtrak\s+trains\s+stalled\s+near\s+Mendota\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+3\s+Amtrak\s+trains\s+stalled\s+near\s+Mendota\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota (score: 1): Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:28:29 -0600; Tonight's Chgo news reports 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota,due to "blowing snow". Any one have details ? As a veteran of the battles of the 77-78 and 78-79 winters that have been documented as; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00020.html (10,770 bytes)
2. Re: [CBQ] 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota (score: 1): Author: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:49:34 -0600 (CST); I'll give BNSF the benefit of a doubt, that crews were deployed to clearing and keeping other parts of the railroad open and that there simply weren't enough men to do everything at the same time. It; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00024.html (12,057 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota (score: 1): Author: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:51:08 -0600 (CST); Hahahahahahahahahaha -- Yahoo Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00025.html (11,021 bytes)
4. Re: [CBQ] 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota (score: 1): Author: Ted Schnepf <railsunl@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 22:05:26 -0600; Hi Leo, I also under stand your confusion. As busy as that line is, the freight trains usually keep the snow passable. May need to run a flanger or a spreader to widen things out, but busy mainlines; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00028.html (11,829 bytes)
5. RE: [CBQ] 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota (score: 1): Author: "Robert McNay" <CptMatt@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:54:27 -0600; A story updated laye 1/7 from the Quincy Herald-Whig actually states that it was a drift that stopped the train. They had to back into Princeton and that BNSF employees were working to reopen the tra; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00029.html (13,358 bytes)
6. Re: [CBQ] 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota (score: 1): Author: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:06:25 -0600; Hi Leo, I also under stand your confusion. As busy as that line is, the freight trains usually keep the snow passable. May need to run a flanger or a spreader to widen things out, but busy mainlines; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00030.html (13,507 bytes)
7. Re: [CBQ] 3 Amtrak trains stalled near Mendota (score: 1): Author: Michael Matalis <mmatalis@sprynet.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:16:35 -0600; __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr; /archives/BRHSLIST/2014-01/msg00031.html (18,787 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]