- 1. Re: [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 19:18:51 -0500
- __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-05/msg00006.html (14,666 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:20:21 +1200
- Does anyone have a 1912 timetable from which they can provide some arrival and departure times? If so, please contact me at gamlen@ihug.co.nz Thanks Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ __._,_.___ Change settin
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00129.html (11,301 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:22:40 +1200
- Ken Martin has helped with information from the public timetable, but does anyone have an employee one for about 1912? I'm specifically seeking information about #8 the Fast Mail and -- Original Mess
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00162.html (12,741 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: archie hayden <klinerarch@charter.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:10:26 -0500
- __._,_.___ Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use Unsubscr
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00185.html (13,576 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:17:19 +1200
- Archie Thanks for this information. Unfortunately, they are not the trains I'm looking for. The #8 I'm seeking was the Omaha to Chicago mail-only train that arrived at Chicago sometime after 7 am, an
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00190.html (13,693 bytes)
- 6. RE: [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: GLEN HAUG <glenehaug@msn.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:19:56 -0700
- Rupert: I am going to be researching some timetables at the Newberry Library later this month and in early May. If you don't have an answer by then, I will look for the schedule of these trains in 19
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00191.html (15,125 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:23:48 +1200
- Glen -- Original Message -- From: glenehaug@msn.com GLEN HAUG To: cbq@yahoogroups.com cbq@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:19 PM Subject: RE: [CBQ] 1912 timetable Rupert: I am going to
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00192.html (16,142 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:24:17 +1200
- Glen Thanks for the offer, I'll bear it in mind. Rupert -- Original Message -- From: glenehaug@msn.com GLEN HAUG To: cbq@yahoogroups.com cbq@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:19 PM Subje
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00193.html (16,219 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CBQ] 1912 timetable (score: 1)
- Author: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:10:34 -0400
- In answer to the question of whether train numbers would be repeated in different divisions, the answer is yes. I've encountered a few instances of that. Duncan Cameron -- Original Message -- From: g
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2012-04/msg00200.html (15,069 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu