Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+\+Re\:\s+SD\s+45\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+\+Re\:\s+SD\s+45\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] +Re: SD 45 (score: 1): Author: "ANDREW KOETZ" <andrewkoetz@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:55:21 -0500; Then why didn't EMD then use wirefeed welding / mig? This process does not produce the "slag" that "stick welding" does. Although the weld penetration would be about 1/2 to what stick welding would b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-08/msg00124.html (10,389 bytes)
2. [CBQ] +Re: SD 45 (score: 1): Author: "ANDREW KOETZ" <andrewkoetz@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:08:39 -0500; To bad "robo-welders" were not available at that time period. With wirefeed or stick welding several passes need to be made in order to properly join the two pieces of metal. It sounds to me that the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-08/msg00141.html (10,097 bytes)
3. Re: [CBQ] +Re: SD 45 (score: 1): Author: Mike <havremt2002@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:58:52 -0700 (PDT); These units were star-crossed from the start. I worked at the oil lab in Lincoln and remember that each series had some unique problem. Lots of cranks and wrist-pins. Some units didn't make it fro; /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-08/msg00142.html (11,201 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]