Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+\"Question\s+for\s+the\s+old\s+heads\:\s+\"Main\s+Track\s+Hostlers\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CBQ\]\s+\"Question\s+for\s+the\s+old\s+heads\:\s+\"Main\s+Track\s+Hostlers\"\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] "Question for the old heads: "Main Track Hostlers" (score: 1): Author: "Karl" <qrailroadman@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:39:57 -0600; Gerald, you're correct ! An "INSIDE HOSTLER" was qualified (usually) to move engines in and around the friendly confines of the RH service tracks (RH walls notwithstanding or, possibly, not STANDING); /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00001.html (10,514 bytes)
2. RE: [CBQ] "Question for the old heads: "Main Track Hostlers" (score: 1): Author: Gerald & Virginia Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 17:32:17 -0500; Tks Karl. As those rules were pretty consistent among Class I RR's I wondered because when I was with C&NW, there was only one class of Hostlers @ Proviso. Loco's needing to be taken beyond the 'Ramp; /archives/BRHSLIST/2010-08/msg00005.html (11,606 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]