- 1. Re: [BRHSlist] heavyweight RPO (score: 1)
- Author: Wes Leatherock <wleath@s...>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:01:10 -0600 (CST)
- Six-window cars were generally full RPOs--the RPO occupied the entire car. Three-window cars were usually half-and=half--onehalf RPO, the other half baggage and express. Two-window cars generally had
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00285.html (8,601 bytes)
- 2. Re: [BRHSlist] heavyweight RPO (score: 1)
- Author: "Cynthia & Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@s...>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:15:02 -0500
- Wes, thanks for the information on the various styles of RPO. I have an idea now which lettering to use. I have two follow-up questions for the list. First, can anyone tell me which numbers would be
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00324.html (7,214 bytes)
- 3. RE: [BRHSlist] heavyweight RPO (score: 1)
- Author: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:03:48 -0600
- Three-window RPO numbers from the CB&Q Passenger Diagram Book: 1910-1916 1921-1945 1947-1949 This actually covers six classes MB-18 through MB-23. The MB-20 and MB-21 only differed in water systems,
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00336.html (8,131 bytes)
- 4. Re: [BRHSlist] heavyweight RPO (score: 1)
- Author: "Cynthia & Duncan Cameron" <d.cameron@s...>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:57:31 -0500
- Thanks, Dave. All that leaves is my question about steps: has anyone found a source for the wide steps below the doors on RPOs and baggage cars besides the cast metal one from Cal-Scale (I think)? I'
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-11/msg00348.html (7,652 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu