Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+You\s+Rule\s+on\s+this\s+one\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+You\s+Rule\s+on\s+this\s+one\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] You Rule on this one (score: 1): Author: hogger41@a...; Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:39:01 EST; Leo, Yes, he was working at an outlying point and if they ran out of men in Aurora, they had to go to the outlying points as the supply. If he answered his phone and worked he should be paid the DH b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-02/msg00047.html (6,191 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] You Rule on this one (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:38:19 EST; Leo et al My understanding, based on personal experience,...now 47 years old, sez that when you are filling an existing vacancy you "accept the conditions of the job" you are filling. Therefore the d; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00348.html (6,761 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] You Rule on this one (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@e...>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 09:58:38 -0600; Leo, I would prepare a declination. I he had been in Mendota and offered to work on the weekend he would not have been entitled a deadhead. That was a personal decision. Paying the claim would also b; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00350.html (8,206 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] you rule on this one (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:40:38 EST; Leo et al That's a bit different from the way I remember it working in the 1950's on the Lincoln Division I had two different situations, where I was deadheaded from Lincoln to Hastings to protect (w; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-01/msg00372.html (9,141 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]