Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+S2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+S2\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] S2 (score: 1): Author: dhelec@a...; Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 11:36:48 EDT; F3 would be esy, LMB O-1 remove pilot and trailing trucks, a couple of small changes. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00131.html (6,389 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] S2 (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 14:01:49 -0700 (PDT); Not so quick! LMB put out an O-1A, the F-3 was made from an O-1. There are several important differences, not the least of which, is the tender(Ryan-Johnson coal pusher or "grapevine"). The cab on th; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00133.html (7,374 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] S2 (score: 1): Author: dhelec@a...; Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:37:02 EDT; Better to dismember an LMB than an Oriental. Tender would be a problem. Old PFM GN articulateds or an Overland F2 would give you the tender. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00134.html (6,412 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] S2 (score: 1): Author: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:03:50 -0700 (PDT); It is still a big job. The crossheads are different, as are the cylinder steam pipes. Even the frame lenth is different, due to the fact that the LMB was a stoker equipped engine with the frame exten; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00135.html (7,429 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] S2 (score: 1): Author: dhelec@a...; Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 21:53:49 EDT; What's life without a challenge? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-05/msg00141.html (6,287 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]