Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Sections\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Sections\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Sections (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...>; Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 20:32:36 -0500; This is really a trite point, but follow-on sections is not the proper term to use when discussing the operation of more than one consist using the same schedule on the same day. The term is section,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00053.html (7,307 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Sections (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:31:05 EDT; Thanks Ed.....I've been waiting for somebody to straighten that out. In the days when railroading was really railroading terminology was all important. For instance: There is no such thing as a "pass; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00058.html (6,928 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Sections (score: 1): Author: Wes Leatherock <wleath@s...>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:58:51 -0500 (CDT); Earlier the rules provided for green flags by day and green lights by night. This was in steam days and continued for quite a while in the diesel era, but the rules were eventually changed to provide; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00060.html (8,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]