Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Passenger\s+F3s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+New\s+Passenger\s+F3s\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Re: New Passenger F3s (score: 1): Author: "wollffee" <wolfee@onebox.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:41:13 -0600; All the Zephyrs I saw were pulled by E units. Were the F's on smaller/locals? Did Burlington ever buy passenger F7 or F9's? with photos -- Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --~--> Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Ki; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00158.html (9,600 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New Passenger F3s (score: 1): Author: "Russell Strodtz" <vlbg@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:31:19 -0600; The passenger F3 sets were bought specifically to power the California Zephyr, most likely because D&RGW and WP were buying F3's for that same train. They did not last very long in that service and w; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00159.html (10,327 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New Passenger F3s (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:08:19 -0600; Based on the recent and excellent Exposition Flyer Bulletin, the passenger F3s were not bought to match the D&RGW and WP purchases. First of all, the D&RGW did not buy F units for the train, they pur; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00165.html (9,772 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New Passenger F3s (score: 1): Author: "zephyr9903" <zephyr9903@iowatelecom.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:22:55 -0600; There may be more to it than that . . . when passenger traffic still mattered, railroads paid attention to what the other lines were doing . . . the AT&SF, western pioneer of A-1-A diesels, gave them; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00171.html (11,064 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: New Passenger F3s (score: 1): Author: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:09:34 -0600; MarshallI hardly believe that the Q stuck with E units because of their crew comfort.... the AT&SF probably had more flat mileage than the Q and they didn't like E units.... probably because of their; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-11/msg00175.html (9,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]