Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Film\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Film\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Film (score: 1): Author: Myron & Lois Dudenbostel <myroloi@e...>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 19:38:41 -0600; Larry, I vote for Fuji. I have used it for more than seven years and have had very good luck with it. When I have used Kodak the colors don't come out smooth ( I guess that is the word to describe it; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00209.html (8,083 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Film (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:51:58 EST; I'm gonna drop my 2 cents...... I personally think that Fugichrome blows away any of the Kodak Slide films.... I like the color from the Fugichrome. I think Fugi color is more accurate than Kodachrom; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00212.html (6,535 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Film (score: 1): Author: Myron & Lois Dudenbostel <myroloi@e...>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:19:52 -0600; The real things!!!!!!! Myron; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00218.html (7,260 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Film (score: 1): Author: Aeolus3@a...; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 01:04:40 EST; I was talking about prototype photography. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00221.html (6,364 bytes)
5. RE: [BRHSlist] Re: Film (score: 1): Author: "Paul Evans" <peke@b...>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 04:29:43 -0600; It is all a matter of opinion. It was all decided by market research ages ago. The average American liked a bit more orange and the Europeans a bit more blue. So historically Kodak has always had an; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-01/msg00227.html (8,280 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]