Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Challenger\s+vs\.\s+Shoreham\s+Shops\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Re\:\s+Challenger\s+vs\.\s+Shoreham\s+Shops\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [BRHSlist] Re: Challenger vs. Shoreham Shops (score: 1): Author: "karllmoore" <karllmoore@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:41:08 -0600; The latest CZ version that Challenger did was/is a very good set. You are correct that the older Challenger/Oriental version compared to the more recent offerings is not as correct and the dome obs l; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00303.html (10,972 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Challenger vs. Shoreham Shops (score: 1): Author: SilvrDome@aol.com; Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 23:45:03 EDT; Karl, Thanks for your details about the CZ. I have the Shoreham Shops CZ and am very pleased. I hope model builders will continue to raise the bar with regards to passenger equipment. That appears to; /archives/BRHSLIST/2003-08/msg00316.html (8,172 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]