Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+RE\:\s+Railroad\s+track\s+width\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+RE\:\s+Railroad\s+track\s+width\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] RE: Railroad track width (score: 1): Author: "D. Gabe Gabriel" <signaling@r...>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:16:15 -0500; It looks to me like the question is the size of the "tracks", not the rail gauge... The standard tie length is what gives us the track width, from edge of tie to edge of tie - 8 ft 6 in However, the; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00189.html (7,586 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] RE: Railroad track width (score: 1): Author: "Karl L Rethwisch" <karlre@r...>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 13:25:05 -0700; One addition to gauge measurement should include the exact point on each rail from which the distance is measured. The inside face of the rail head (ball of the rail or gauge face) is the surface fro; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00190.html (8,866 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]