Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Nebraska\s+Zephyr\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Nebraska\s+Zephyr\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Nebraska Zephyr (score: 1): Author: SilvrDome@a...; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:37:21 EST; Dave, I'm speculating, but since the "Coloradoan" carried the same number between Chicago and Denver, using 19 and 6 would be less confusion for passenger agents and ticket clerks writing tickets and; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00159.html (6,478 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Nebraska Zephyr (score: 1): Author: PSHedgpeth@a...; Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:12:38 EST; Dave No operating TT would ever show two trains on the same schedule...That would have been a big time no no and would not ever have happened. How the number of the train to be shown was arrived at I; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00163.html (6,328 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Nebraska Zephyr (score: 1): Author: "VLBG" <VLBG@s...>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:58:31 -0600; David, Two trains can not operate on the same schedule. The logic behind which number to use is not too difficult. Using the "thru" schedule for the entire distance is simpler and less confusing. ,; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00172.html (7,698 bytes)
4. RE: [BRHSlist] Nebraska Zephyr (score: 1): Author: "David E. Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:02:46 -0600; Thanks to all who replied to my query! This is the first venture I've made into seriously studying operational practices on the Q. Goes to show that your never too old to learn! Dave David, Two train; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00173.html (8,518 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] Nebraska Zephyr (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Levine" <sjl@p...>; Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:04:10 -0600; Amtrak once had a separate column in its timetable for the Denver Zephyr after the San Francisco Zephyr became daily. The DZ's were listed as trains 55 and 56, but those numbers were never recognized; /archives/BRHSLIST/2002-02/msg00189.html (8,945 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]