Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Calendar\s+Caption\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+Calendar\s+Caption\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] Calendar Caption (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...>; Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 13:29:39 -0500; Bob: Thanks for reading the caption and noticing the oversight. Somehow, that detail flew past me as I was putting the calendar together...... What was I thinking? Ed DeRouin; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00020.html (6,890 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] Calendar Caption (score: 1): Author: drale99@a...; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:30:20 EDT; Another question I would raise about the caption (as if I had any business complaining about the calendar, which is great!): To me (a 30's and 40's modeler) the locos in the photo are 3rd generation; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00031.html (6,432 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] Calendar Caption (score: 1): Author: Ed DeRouin <PIXELS@A...>; Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 09:58:20 -0500; Drale: As I understand, and that leaves plenty of room for interpretation, the generally accepted distinction between diesel locomotive generations is a function of technology and utilization, and n; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00036.html (9,307 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] Calendar Caption (score: 1): Author: John Mitchell <cbqrr47@y...>; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:59:10 -0700 (PDT); I guess everyone looks at this a little differant but, I think if a diesel was intended to replace steam power, then it was a 1st generation. If it was to replace another diesel, then it was 2nd gene; /archives/BRHSLIST/2001-06/msg00039.html (7,384 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]