Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+BRHS\s+Bulletins\,\s+Final\s+Word\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BRHSlist\]\s+BRHS\s+Bulletins\,\s+Final\s+Word\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS Bulletins, Final Word? (score: 1): Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>; Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 17:27:08 -0600; Ray Cottingham <cttnghmrl@a...> recently wondered: Well, Ray the first sentence kinda answered the question in part - for those who are interested in _just_ history a historical society, by definitio; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00088.html (9,697 bytes)
2. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS Bulletins, Final Word? (score: 1): Author: rgortowski@a...; Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 20:14:36 EST; << So, it seems the status quo will be maintained until some fledgling author steps up and writes the needed material. Of course, they will need access to Society information to research their subjec; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00089.html (8,631 bytes)
3. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS Bulletins, Final Word? (score: 1): Author: Bob Webber <zephyr1@a...>; Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 19:32:19 -0600; I would like to suggest that perhaps there is an answer for both the authors and the society. While the results may not be complete enough to create a full book, or even an article, it may be the way; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00090.html (9,437 bytes)
4. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS Bulletins, Final Word? (score: 1): Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>; Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 16:40:47 -0600; exist. >There is very little information in our archives that can be used for research >and there are very few photographs. The BRHS did not receive any large >collections when the Burlington Norther; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00092.html (8,632 bytes)
5. Re: [BRHSlist] BRHS Bulletins, Final Word? (score: 1): Author: Paul/Celine Kossart <kozys@t...>; Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 17:15:15 -0600; Bob Webber <zephyr1@a...> recently stated: Bob brings up a good point. Now realizing that the bulk of the Societies "archives" lies with individuals, this may be a money making opportunity for the ho; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00093.html (9,260 bytes)
6. RE: [BRHSlist] BRHS Bulletins, Final Word? (score: 1): Author: "David Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@m...>; Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 23:52:23 -0600; I would like to clarify some assumptions that have been were made in Paul's last post...These are for the whole list, not directed at any one person. <So, it seems the status quo will be maintained u; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00094.html (11,124 bytes)
7. RE: [BRHSlist] BRHS Bulletins, Final Word? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Worones <JWORONES@S...>; Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 16:15:24 -0800; Anyone mind if I throw in a few thoughts. Belonging to Societies with both types of 'philosophies', they both have positives and negatives. With the multiple article approach, you get more variety bu; /archives/BRHSLIST/2000-11/msg00101.html (9,412 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]