Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:atsf3460@frontier.com: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CBQ] C&S 55 ton coal hoppers. Used on Lines East? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael" <atsf3460@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:00:41 -0600
I'd like to know if the C&S fleet of coal hoppers generally stayed online or whether they may have been considered part of the general fleet of coal cars on the CB&Q. I've been thinking that some of
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-06/msg00048.html (10,582 bytes)

2. [CBQ] Re: Any date for "Genesis" Blackbird GP7 ? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael" <atsf3460@frontier.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:13:02 -0600
Athearn may be planning on doing a CB&Q version but it has not yet been announced. The only GP-7 roadname announced so far is Pennsy. Union Pacific and Seaboard Air Line are announced so far for the
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-06/msg00049.html (11,139 bytes)

3. [CBQ] Neat eBay auction... sign off of an O1a. (score: 1)
Author: "Michael" <atsf3460@frontier.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:50:52 -0600
Auction has expired now but this was a very cool auction. Sign is off of an O1a 2-8-2 tender. I think it was very well bought at the price it fetched. Hopefully the picture of the O1a will go with th
/archives/BRHSLIST/2011-06/msg00088.html (10,102 bytes)

4. [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? Or diesel? (score: 1)
Author: "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 04 Oct 2015 16:21:47 -0700
Does anybody know if there were ever any proposed CB&Q steam but never built or diesel for that matter? I'm guessing that the "Q" must have been in good shape motive-wise thru the 1930s and going int
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00009.html (14,797 bytes)

5. [CBQ] Re: Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? Or diesel? (score: 1)
Author: "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 04 Oct 2015 16:25:10 -0700
I'll correct myself about the DZ. It sort of had E-units but they were the shovel-nosed EAs! Mike __._,_.___ Posted by: atsf3460@frontier.com Visit Your Group New Members 2 Yahoo! Groups &bull; Priva
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00010.html (13,361 bytes)

6. RE: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? (score: 1)
Author: "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 04 Oct 2015 23:34:30 -0700
Hi Rupert and list, Good idea about the herald. One idea I had was to use a cheap Bachmann NKP 2-8-4 as painted and paint out the names on the tender with black paint and use a Burlington Route decal
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00015.html (16,845 bytes)

7. Re: [CBQ] Q Steam Being Scrapped At NWS&W (score: 1)
Author: "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 26 Oct 2015 08:08:08 -0700
Ouch! Let's not mention Erman-Howell's scrap yard at 83rd St.! That's, I'm pretty sure, where #5632 bought it!!!!! That area along the lake is vacant and undeveloped and probably industrial brownfiel
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00220.html (13,081 bytes)

8. Re: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? (score: 1)
Author: "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 26 Oct 2015 08:39:21 -0700
Responding to an older post when we were talking about hypothetical Q steam Louis wrote, October 5, 2015 Mike and Rupert - I believe that Charlie Vlk might be able to tell us more, but it's my unders
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00222.html (16,012 bytes)

9. Re: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? (score: 1)
Author: "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 26 Oct 2015 08:43:53 -0700
Ooops, I read that totally wrong. I interpreted the NYC super Hudson to be the J3as from the later '30s. If the NYC Hudson would have been on the Q during the time period the S4as were being contempl
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00223.html (13,414 bytes)

10. Re: [CBQ] Q Steam Being Scrapped At NWS&W (score: 1)
Author: "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 26 Oct 2015 08:53:37 -0700
I suspect watching the 0-8-0s at the steel mill in Sterling was kind of bittersweet for the older guys on the list considering all the steamers cut up there. When I got to see them when I was a kid o
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00224.html (14,316 bytes)

11. Re: [CBQ] Proposed but never built CB&Q steam? (score: 1)
Author: "atsf3460@frontier.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: 26 Oct 2015 09:03:32 -0700
Yeah, I know the Q already had heavy Pacifics in the form of S3s but a reworked model of a Southern Railway 4-6-2 would be so much more handsome than an S3. I've wondered for a long time why the styl
/archives/BRHSLIST/2015-10/msg00225.html (14,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu