- 1. [CBQ] Re: New Q Diesels and Frieght Cars - HO Scale (Addendum) (score: 1)
- Author: "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:42:57 -0600
- I am also wondering if Atlas will put the taper in front of the radiator. These locos were phase IIa and came with such a taper. The drawing shows it without. Ed -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit y
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-09/msg00019.html (10,442 bytes)
- 2. [CBQ] Re: New Q Diesels and Frieght Cars - HO Scale (Addendum) (score: 1)
- Author: "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:12:08 -0600
- Atlas has stated that the model will not come with the taper. Ed -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individu
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-09/msg00072.html (10,626 bytes)
- 3. [CBQ] Re: Walthers Flexi-van (score: 1)
- Author: "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:40:50 -0600
- guess ? 933-1685). I received the following e-mail response from Walthers when I asked about the Q Flexi-van I had on order: "Dear Mr. Sutorik, Thank you for taking the time to contact Walthers in re
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-07/msg00007.html (10,291 bytes)
- 4. [CBQ] Walthers Flexi-van (score: 1)
- Author: "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:34:22 -0600
- Walthers will not be doing the Flexi-van in Burlington (pn. 933-1685). Ed -- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings:
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2008-06/msg00204.html (9,136 bytes)
- 5. [CBQ] New Exactrail RBCS car (score: 1)
- Author: "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:18:39 -0600
- Exactrail has announced a new car (PC&F "beer" car) that's to be offered in the series RBCS 3065-3127. I'm not having any luck finding pictures of these cars. Anyone know how they'll likely be painte
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-11/msg00000.html (9,372 bytes)
- 6. [CBQ] Re: New Exactrail RBCS car (score: 1)
- Author: "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:32:58 -0600
- Thinkin' on this a bit more: The cars were built in 1976, but C&S wasn't merged into the BN until 1981. So, while it would seem quite likely that the cars were delivered in the "standard" green BN sc
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-11/msg00001.html (10,809 bytes)
- 7. [CBQ] Re: New Exactrail RBCS car (score: 1)
- Author: "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:18:54 -0600
- Thank you, John, for the info and the photo. I do wonder if the Exactrail model has all those rivets that show up in the photo. Getting exactness out of Exactrail is problematic. Ed -- Yahoo! Groups
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-11/msg00010.html (10,158 bytes)
- 8. [CBQ] Re: New Exactrail RBCS car (score: 1)
- Author: "spsalso" <Edwardsutorik@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:34:41 -0600
- It looks like they modeled an SP car. That car has the rivets, so the RBCS/BN cars should too. In examining photos kindly sent to me from Q modelers, I note that the as-delivered RBCS cars came in th
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2009-11/msg00012.html (10,838 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CBQ] Re: Walthers Proto CB&Q E-9 announcement (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 01 Sep 2016 14:49:28 -0700
- John, I stopped at my shop to order these E9's this morning, and the owner said the same thing. I asked him to get the "missing" set if he could, but that the other (two loco) set would do, otherwise
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-09/msg00004.html (12,643 bytes)
- 10. [CBQ] Re: FW: Antique 1 6 Plate Tintype Photo CB Q Railroad RR Train Engine Locomotive (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 10 Sep 2016 12:39:58 -0700
- It "feels" more like a 4-4-0 to me. If you could come in on the locomotive only. Maybe also supply a second version with less contrast and lightened to show detail where the driver(s) is/are. Ed Edwa
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-09/msg00101.html (14,495 bytes)
- 11. [CBQ] Re: Walthers Proto CB&Q E-9 announcement (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 31 Aug 2016 15:55:03 -0700
- John Olson looks to be right on his views of Walthers cancellations. Today I saw that 920-42356 was removed from the Walthers announcement list. That would be the DCC-sound 9985AB. Clever of them to
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2016-08/msg00165.html (11,417 bytes)
- 12. [CBQ] Off-line baggage cars for a Q express train (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 24 Sep 2017 01:31:42 +0000
- I'm putting together an approximation of a CB&Q storage mail and express train from about 1965. Clearly, Q cars would be in it. But I am wondering which other railroads would have contributed cars. A
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-09/msg00077.html (12,959 bytes)
- 13. Re: [CBQ] Off-line baggage cars for a Q express train (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 24 Sep 2017 15:15:36 +0000
- Thanks, all, for your answers. There's certainly more roads there than I thought of. Excellent! More options. Regarding the troop-sleeper baggage, I'm all set with those. I've just got to change the
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-09/msg00083.html (14,163 bytes)
- 14. Re: [CBQ] Off-line baggage cars for a Q express train (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 27 Sep 2017 20:01:20 +0000
- Tom, Keep in mind that what I'm trying to do is put together a sort of believable train, not necessarily a totally accurate one. I want one where Burlington fans don't bust out laughing. So I doubt I
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2017-09/msg00092.html (16,604 bytes)
- 15. Re: [CBQ] Elephant Style Es (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 11 Jan 2018 23:32:46 +0000
- I'm "collecting" Burlington E's to pull various trains. And, of course, one MUST look at photos to get things right. It becomes obvious that elephant-style setups were very common during my time of i
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00056.html (14,940 bytes)
- 16. Re: [CBQ] Elephant Style Es (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 12 Jan 2018 00:55:25 +0000
- Single E's likely ran on branch lines. And there's pretty much only one way to put an E on a train. And turning that E, or not, is not really part of this. We're talking running 2 and more E's (becau
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00060.html (14,237 bytes)
- 17. Re: [CBQ] Elephant Style Es (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 12 Jan 2018 01:09:19 +0000
- I agree there is less wind resistance at the connection between when two E's are coupled back to back. But note that the car behind them has a goodly bit of flat frontal area. And it is hugely expose
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00061.html (14,770 bytes)
- 18. [CBQ] Re: Elephant Style Es (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 12 Jan 2018 02:21:42 +0000
- David, I have heard that (about minimizing time loss). It was said earlier in the topic. But rather than assertions, I would like facts. If you know of some in the Bulletins, it would be nice if you
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00067.html (14,833 bytes)
- 19. [CBQ] Re: Es (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 12 Jan 2018 02:48:03 +0000
- Mr. Weber, I'm not getting your point. Could you develop if further. Ed Edward Sutorik __._,_.___ Posted by: Edwardsutorik@aol.com Visit Your Group New Members 1 Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • U
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00068.html (11,626 bytes)
- 20. RE: [CBQ] Elephant Style Es (score: 1)
- Author: "Edwardsutorik@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
- Date: 12 Jan 2018 02:55:09 +0000
- Tom, I'm not a follower of Santa Fe locomotive practice. But on the NP there was a similar setup: You could see the North Coast Limited being hauled by an AABA set. The front two A's were both cab fo
- /archives/BRHSLIST/2018-01/msg00069.html (15,044 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu