Re: [CBQ] E5 step lights

["tom kline" <TKline@airmail.net>]

No, the opposite! J

TK

 

From: CBQ@groups.io [mailto:CBQ@groups.io] On Behalf Of Doug Hartman via groups.io
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2026 3:56 PM
To: CBQ <CBQ@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] E5 step lights

 

Is "caboose" a Santa Fe term?

 

On Fri, May 1, 2026, 3:33 PM Dave Weber via groups.io <dave=cimmarondesign.com@groups.io> wrote:

and waycars were to be called cabooses. rarely happened around house 9

On May 1, 2026, at 9:49 AM, Leo Phillipp via groups.io <qutlx1=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:

 

Mike,

 

Now you’ve gone and done it?! On the Chicago & Aurora divisions of BN the use of word”motors” to describe locomotives was forbidden somewhere around 1975 or ‘76 by posted notices from management . Said notices stated locomotive were to be referred as such or as units but definitely not as “motors”. Occasionally there were even corrections or chastisement on the radio for using the forbidden term.

That had been a “Q” term.

 

Leo Phillipp

On May 1, 2026, at 9:34 AM, Mike Decker via groups.io <mdecker=gwtc.net@groups.io> wrote:



Ed is correct.  When I started a train, I always looked down at the ground to tell when I was moving.  We didn't have any E's or F's on the Alliance Division when I hired out, but all the motors had the ground lights.

 

Mike

 

_._,_._,_

---

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#68273) | Reply to Group | Reply to Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_