RE: [CBQ] Alignment Charts in BB#53 Addendum

["Nelson Moyer npmoyer@hotmail.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>]

Thanks, I Googled Chatt without the s and came up empty. The photo of the OK pile shows a light gray overall color, so I’ll use that as a starting point and mix in some lighter and darker material. I have a bag of Flint Hills ballast HO ballast, but the darkest pieces seem a little too dark. The N scale ballast doesn’t show as much contrast in the online photograph on Q connection, so I may try that option. I suspect the N scale rock size is closer to prototype rock size.

 

Nelson Moyer

 

From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 8:29 AM
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Alignment Charts in BB#53 Addendum

 

This may help:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chat_(mining)

 

KCS and Frisco made extensive use of chat ballast.

 

msw

largofl

 

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Nelson Moyer npmoyer@hotmail.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

The alignment chart for MP 205-206 (from the Bridge to Main Street in Burlington) list three ballast types over the years, chatts 1943, L. S. 1957, and slag 1960. I assume L. S. is limestone, and I know what slag ballast looks like, but what is chatts, and what does it look like? I ask Steve Holding, and he thinks it’s unscreened crushed limestone, but if that’s true, why would the alignment chart list chatts in 1943 and L.S. in 1957 if they’re the same thing?

 

Nelson Moyer

 

__._,_.___

---

Posted by: Nelson Moyer <npmoyer@hotmail.com>

---

Visit Your Group

• New Members 1
• New Photos 3

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___