BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Passenger geeps on dinkies

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Passenger geeps on dinkies
From: "qutlx1@aol.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 19:35:20 -0500
Authentication-results: mta1004.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=aol.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=mx.aol.com; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1499560883; bh=uw+SViJbRVuy1feP9TSrop/1lEtJHKsyftDYuhq+Wmg=; h=References:In-Reply-To:To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=kq7n/oQKaqnsDhbrNw3h3whWuXQfekU4qXiB+n7Sw1rtFpb+OkFKRgP6l/vgY3MuyeJ8UV4u8XVqopi0OcCpIZ9BKsUK3PmoHVliETsgDGJ3lJCpkAT41n0PL3ediUkL//qK/E/0A4k64xyV1zDIKR3FTjEULHdcBPX7g32InN0=
In-reply-to: <F730C90F-74B8-451E-8EBC-8C4B2E4753E7@aol.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <d5963.6444286c.4692586d@aol.com> <F730C90F-74B8-451E-8EBC-8C4B2E4753E7@aol.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


Dennis,

I just want to say That was a very complete and correct answer. It was a  routine event on Sunday evening to see 5-7 E Units on a westbound dinky to have power at Aurora for Monday morning.

Can you imagine the acceleration and torque on one to two cars with 5 or more E Units !

Leo Phillipp

On Jul 8, 2017, at 1:21 PM, Dennis Popish qchooch@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

Michael:

The diesel maintenance facilities in Chicago ("Zephyr Pit") and at the Aurora shops were the home bases for all E units on the east end of the system. So all E units that traversed west to Denver, Lincoln, Kansas City and the Twin Cities on long distance consists eventually returned to Chicago. The E units were rotated between long distance service and the commuter run between Chicago and Aurora to equalize wear conditions particularly for the diesel engines since the repeated starting and stopping of commuter service was actually harder on engine, braking and wheel components than running at sustained speeds over longer distances. A schedule of this E unit rotation was adhered to for all units with records kept and submitted for the required "Federal" inspection reports filed with the FRA, Federal Railway Administration.

So the likelihood of insufficient E units for commuter service would never be an issue.
Probably the only times a geep or other freight unit was seen on the commuter line was delivering new wheels, passenger trucks or locomotive traction motors to the Aurora and Chicago maintenance shops on flat cars that were normal maintenance replacement items required to be installed in the E units and/or passenger cars.

Hope this is of some value to you.

Dennis Popish

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 8, 2017, at 10:46 AM, LZadnichek@aol.com [CBQ] <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

July 8, 2017
 
Michael - Have never seen a photo of such. Best Regards - Louis
 
In a message dated 7/8/2017 8:18:15 A.M. Central Daylight Time, CBQ@yahoogroups.com writes:


Were passenger geeps ever used on commuter trains, even as just a stop gap measure?



Thank you kindly,

Michael Matalis
Downers Grove IL

You can see my railroad photography blog at http://www.chasingheavymetal.com/blog/
You can see my photos and my ugly mug at http://www.flickr.com/photos/prairierailfan/sets/
And you can now find me and my fine felines on Facebook











__._,_.___

Posted by: qutlx1@aol.com



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>