BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Dome Sleeper for CZ

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Dome Sleeper for CZ
From: "ku0a@mchsi.com [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:31:06 -0500 (CDT)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1409668268; bh=F6AmEqYm5ulwnA+X/oMX3U+AH8ityQm/JSQqzaBOFlM=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Authority-Analysis:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Original-From:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=jaotWdGbUmnD3kJXxbRe/C73j1tsvNlXkwxRczDPxS91+EjoNLlY1a07e7EQeQGV7Uz6L+VxBJxojRFrf3FOtPkn93HaJb5ExgyRw6Jd+8YvnRx/bqQmBPftL2O7pFOsDA2SRC/UHsd1tH1iG7/MGDUaLbevKdRztRHQIe7q5o0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=HMu8DOeU6twXQzCtFCQyQrDxjd+euROBJmcM/5OujbBKPMlNpxdLRayPLjDIVCbvAFbqrJERP30SXeA4JikKa4cB9qqWLchgVA+MUO52ae6FH1Pe1Pwo3dMmuY/9Ff1qMx7hFt3SwFjkmF5Mf+idzCReFRjg1bOOGeOPI/l7KKk=;
In-reply-to: <lu2tl2+dj1sm9@YahooGroups.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


My guess is that domes on sleepers would have reduced the available space for sleeping compartments, so they weren't cost effective.

Nelson Moyer

----- Original Message -----
From: beaumec39@gmail.com [CBQ]
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 17:57:38 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [CBQ] Dome Sleeper for CZ









Gents,

Has anyone covered the topic of dome-sleepers for the CZ?

Has this been covered in the Burlington Bulletin?

Has it been covered in this group?

I have come across drawings of proposed dome-sleepers @ CSRM. 3 varieties

I know the CB&Q-D&RGW-WP went for the 6DB-5Cpt sleepers.

Reason(s) dome-sleepers didn't happen?

Thanks,


Alan Hegler

MoPac Forever!





__._,_.___

Posted by: ku0a@mchsi.com



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>