| To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CBQ] Signal Question |
| From: | Richard Kistler <rckistler@windstream.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:35:52 -0600 |
| Authentication-results: | pacmmta55 ; auth=pass smtp.auth=rckistler@windstream.net |
| Delivered-to: | unknown |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1393950948; bh=i8jkAEleMzlSgg59TOCs+H82/d9c7DjoJsYgm3uNGVg=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-WS-COS:X-Cloudmark-Category:X-Cloudmark-Analysis:X-Cloudmark-Score:X-WS-Auth:Authentication-Results:Message-ID:User-Agent:To:X-Enigmail-Version:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=geiXUm73CJVfLXO4VkfMZ7g9rpS/jKPfsqMdgttUP8vK5AKc0U41VJ1Wth0ZQqBzJrhwDQX1QCrmwCpXP+J+NEXsxKJFmGXbvp9VOu5sXYavpJnK9s4H21b5eNMytePcsw18rydU9/T0y//R3WawUHqi25pBF/nXPS03HjspVTE= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=bU3+t6sC+OKwcH1wVIMZ1NxHJ4DRqMrIFH8X/eDiLr1x5P8OiIVv6qHBDIsgKAkqFQSK+iB7ZLuIeo4ZrEooiKB/d7Tj3JjuDMSztue8ZmuO6GpSnldhIYaskMqGngDWnM/dJEy1vna+RYolkXTmzgApR/cR7enIt3OogkodHck=; |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 |
Pete - If I remember correctly, in the CB&Q Operating Rules c-1910
(can't get to mine right now as I am rearranging everything so I can
never find anything again) is an example of the type of signal
shown in the photo of the Superior depot, and an explanation of that
type of semaphore. The brick depot was constructed in 1914, unknown when
this photo was taken, I would guess 1920. The train
order signal at the Superior depot during my life time 1935-until it was
torn down in 1986, was the standard train order semaphore. What the
purpose of the double set of blades would be is a mystery, as
nothing changed as far as trackage, yard limits or operating practices
that I know of from 1914 on to the present. Superior was never
a dual purpose station, it was not possible for another railroad to
enter CB&Q tracks. During the United Railway Administration (WW 1) the
CB&Q Superior depot was used as a Union Station for the
AT&SF and C&NW (whose joint station was adjacent to the Burlington
station), but they never entered Q tracks for that purpose. Sorry I
couldn't be of more help. - Richard Kistler
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] questions about 2014 Calendar/ working the dinkies, RWA325 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Signal Question, Jpslhedgpeth |
| Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Crawford, Ne. depot, Rupert & Maureen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Signal Question, Jpslhedgpeth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |