BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CBQ] Oiling track

To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Oiling track
From: "Charlie Vlk" <cvlk@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:56:19 -0600
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1389383786; bh=5w7JHJMpn2/lXny6qKm7MprwRFPo2ZCSA/yz66rU2Mg=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=yzN7kS/eWHlcnbuYxb+89JeEWej5q5Eb6EVkSzLQekec+9erMd4xkjd7fkFiRsi1dgNIkJjXsmA6QhMxKA0uOWl319NRkjnlYCpH4DjTC1EB5QlZgHypOP8sCQOc+vtfYitJc/2DMLPOq8SdcB5mDgFszGY+8q7cTQyCcjL1vxc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=lmekRu1ee4OJ5PTZ9+epePEpecUYraG9nwdda/xskWiV5URSHhejDC3wORu0DtsnhRWE5wrZ6VTGT2VXMBdnuVThRNgHpD1td/vJ/3s/ThtuehGHbRvG8gA3IvFskjekCYZ9xI9ztnC4j+wQjceay6tuNaw10IQD9KTkWppKaM8=;
In-reply-to: <6AC674DDA2BF434BBDB46A47438E295C@USUS>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <21856371.1383291548046.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net>,<3F4D307E-8B98-4AFC-9808-2ED467567B39@aol.com> <BAY173-W4868DE45ED0E5B35EB46E0CAF50@phx.gbl> <D8FA52E6BB834AB4A2B1944D3DEAC2DF@USUS> <01ba01cf0d6a$36219a20$a264ce60$@net> <6AC674DDA2BF434BBDB46A47438E295C@USUS>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Thread-index: Ac7XDWPYspaJPDwWQ3ObdtsV3Dj5NwAKInEQDYzuorAAD3mvAAAlki9w


Rupert-

Could be.   The article says “the same equipment was being used on the IC” which fits since the car isn’t (as far as can be proven) a CB&Q tank car.   But who knows…yet???

Thanks,
Charlie

 

From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rupert & Maureen
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:16 PM
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Oiling track

 

 

Charlie

I’m not sure that contractors were used.  A single column article in Railway Age Gazette 1912 volume 53 page 615 refers to the Burlington and Illinois Central oiling their tracks including the statement “The Burlington used about 1,800 gal. of oil per mile at a total cost for the first 39 miles of about $50 per mile.  The Illinois Central used about 2,200 gal. per mile.”  The phraseology of the article suggests that the companies were doing their own work and makes no reference to contractors or widespread railroad oiling.  If they had been using contractors, I would have expected a similar oil usage over both lines.

Rupert Gamlen
Auckland NZ

 


From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Charlie Vlk
Sent: Friday, 10 January 2014 7:40 a.m.
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Oiling track


Going through old emails and had a chance to look up this item.   The article states the same equipment was being used on the IC Commuter District from Grand Crossing to Randolph Street so I imagine the cars were owned by a service that was providing the crew and equipment, similar to Speno in more recent times.

Rupert also found other articles:

Oiling track B&MR (1900) (R&ER vol. 40 page 443)

Oiling track CB&Q and B&MR (1899) (RA vol. 28 page 752)

Oiling track with tank car (? ex B&MR) (1911) (RAG vol. 51 page 525)

Oiling track with tank car photo (1911) (RAG vol. 51 page 525)

 

Charlie Vlk






__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>