Re: [CBQ] Trains orders to "C&M"

["John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>]

Motorman not motor car driver, we are not in England!

 

On Thursday, January 9, 2014 7:07 AM, Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca> wrote:

 



In the rather large number of Keokuk orders I've accumulated I believe there some that are addressed to C&M as well.

Motorcar driver rather than engineer?

Duncan Cameron

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 10:48 PM

Subject: Re: [CBQ] Trains orders to "C&M"

 

Leo...to add to the TO you saw....In the ICC report on the collision of the PZ and the south local at Napier, MO in October '39 the train orders were addressed to  No. 21 MOTORCAR 9900.   During my braking days most train orders were address to MOTOR NO 1234.   I'll have to check if I've seen anything addressed to c&M.   Although some were as above most were addressed to Engine No. 1234....seemed to be dependent on what the dispatcher wanted to do.

Pete

-----Original Message-----
From: Leo <qutlx1@aol.com>
To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wed, Jan 8, 2014 8:20 pm
Subject: [CBQ] Trains orders to "C&M"

 

I just picked up some 1942 Aurora division train orders. While I have seen the language in one that states"zephyr type motor trains must not,,,,,,,,,"before; I now see something new on two orders changing a meet from Polo to Milledgeville addressed to C&M no 22. Not C&E as was the norm. Don't think I've ever seen that before.

Leo Phillipp

Sent from my iPad

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___