To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Re: Remote control cabooses |
From: | "zepyr99000" <zephyr9900@charter.net> |
Date: | Sat, 18 May 2013 13:44:43 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1368884685; bh=ydWFtpWT5rkQOgknFrSdKyEZMyxTaA+tfqD4UXht/DE=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wKYfsF/42/OH3e6xnBoJr+v8GaliCl4pJhQAx4/FDDrb41btwhgr1NJL9AeBv5uaCcOBfDmz8z2iquLX1dUeMt8/1r2Lopmum7+94cZ+uShMg3i17x4tvD2hi2WScaj/sK1gOaIvWBdTgCeq/Fme33nqlSY6E/QPoRLqTtIaU5Q= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=bJJXhjtlQ7im/tO5LWg7R+vilGiO3dy3KRwe6eXUcc7Gl52tjQIC3Mvb5F804QhlsOFk7Chu4it3RjxG3GIqNPb1l4ASsnBcRr8B/jN6fPh7Aa1AAPiBsz3GI1ouSk1xDObQhDaAn2NjzM9hF1cPTVB0r+7EGzDAVe687F6bsyw=; |
In-reply-to: | <kn5dq7+c7tb@eGroups.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
The far less expensive dedicated caboose has the remote control electronics mounted in it and can be MUed with any combination of non-dedicated motive power as opposed to the electronics mounted in a expensive dedicated locomotive. Also the broken caboose can be fixed and returned to service a lot quicker than a broken locomotive. And the head light at both ends just adds versatility in caboose placement. Just my 2¢ Herb --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "bobbinbill229" <wscott@...> wrote: > > If you scroll down this page > > http://mrlblog.qstation.org/?p=1243 > > to the 7th picture, you see a rear view of a MRL caboose. My questions are > > 1. How come they still use cabooses and hardly anyone else does? > 2. The large white light on its roof makes sense, but I don't remember such > lights on cabooses in the past. What did they do when backing up a train? > Didn't they need a white light on the rear car? > 3. The lettering on the side of the car says "remote control caboose," what > can you tell me about remote control cabooses? > 4. Did CB&Q own remote control cabooses, or are they way too recent an > invention? > > Thanks > > Bill Scott > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Proto 2000 USRA 0-8-0, John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Re: Remote control cabooses, Dave Lotz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Remote control cabooses, Bob Weber |
Next by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Re: Remote control cabooses, Dave Lotz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |