To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Re: Motor Car Collision |
From: | "broken bolster" <therrboomer@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:13:13 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1359069196; bh=GpC2G7Px0SQYJszMFnhY+famX4HT8t2QGwnU5um/lyU=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CQ5NK9Nre4eZ7CeWLv7dKyIDAvTYiDsn9aQ7QjXwM+RfpCeOa+ADxEmT+w0EqZdd/RSi9sBUiaIty9xFD2g18DXMAvi8tNGSYv8d7WyzcBCr/wh2Pgy8rh3bGGABuZSz3wfMy8uK6u6cGrMTJIHMWuhRvphfFi8j0E+dq4l/1hY= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=yse7oMM7Rdy4mNpjb3rD05r85+dbV6tcYE0EaQ5mPkZxs4UfdB3PTkNechXH7mTsdxXTZB1Z3kmmq/7BhlYQMRuQ1neSMfDvOviN7e2Y9HXINGv1yrKokiQYM1kwLPylL5HNby1rTGMQ8rtQIgU1rEpBLc1kWEmMAKZCKWluwW0=; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
I respectfully disagree. The Online Special Collection does not have all the accident reports. I years past I've read ICC reports that are not in the online collection. The Montgomery report (1963?)is not shown and I know that generated an ICC report. In 1964 I was an operator on GTW and each one of us had to sign off that we had read and understoodthe that very ICC report. Dick Haave --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, HOL WAGNER wrote: > > > It's my understanding that the Special Collections does indeed have ALL the > ICC accident investigation reports from 1912 on and that the real question is > how the federal regularotry agency decided which accidents it would > investigate and which it would not. As Pete suggests, some very serious > accidents went uninvestigated. It appears the ICC wanted to investigate and > report on accidents that were different in their basic cause from ones it had > previously investigated. It was always looking to make a point with its > investigations. For many years the major point was that the accident could > have been avoided if a better block signal system, or even better, an > automatic train control system, had been in use. > > Hol > > > > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Emergency Waycars, Charlie Vlk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Shovelnoses on the C&S-FW&D, Charlie Vlk |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Wagon Wheel Antenna, John Manion |
Next by Thread: | RE: [CBQ] Re: Motor Car Collision, HOL WAGNER |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |