THanks Leo...the pressure is mounting so my round tuit may be "on the bell".
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: qutlx1 <qutlx1@aol.com>
To: CBQ <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 18, 2012 1:24 pm
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Railroad Terminology
Pete
I have Q train orders in my collection with the run wild verbage. If you get around to the article I'll be glad to loan them for it
Leo Phillipp
Sent from my iPhone
Thanks for "run wild" Steve I had forgotten about that one, but I've seen actual train orders using this designation for what we would call an "extra train"
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: STEVEN HOLDING < sholding@sbcglobal.net>
To: CBQ < CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, Dec 18, 2012 8:21 am
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Railroad Terminology
use to use "on the light" and "hit the bell"
An early _expression_ for an Extra Train(not in the scheduled timetable) was "Run Wild"
From: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, December 18, 2012 12:17:31 AM
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Buda-Elmwood Branch Passenger Service
Or "hit the bell" or "He's shining me right now" Ever hear that last one, Steve? And how about "riding yellows" and "running crooked"?
--- On Mon, 12/17/12, Mike Cafferata <mcaff1@htc.net> wrote:
From: Mike Cafferata <mcaff1@htc.net>
Subject: RE: [CBQ] Buda-Elmwood Branch Passenger Service
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, December 17, 2012, 9:35 PM
How about “On the circuit” or “hit the circuit”?
Mike Cafferata
YES INDEED....I "OPINED" RE PROTECT A FEW DAYS AGO.
-----Original Message-----
From: dhartman <dhartman@mchsi.com>
To: CBQ yahoo <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 17, 2012 12:03 pm
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Buda-Elmwood Branch Passenger Service
Anyone mention "protect" yet?
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:28:31 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Buda-Elmwood Branch Passenger Service
I am VERY MUCH INTERESTED STEVE/.. Anybody else with anything along this line...I'm getting warmed up (again) to the idea of putting together a "compendium" of this stuff...ie RR terms, references, abbreviations pertinent phrasing etc).
I knew I had another item just had to dig it out
My Train Sheet from Monday Sept. 17, 1962. This was saved by P K Hannah and I managed to talk him out of it.
It covers the Bushnell to Beardstown Sub(Roseville to Beardstown thru Bushnell)(Now the busy coal main)(( on this day only 62 north with 66 annulled and 63 and 73 south. And the wayfreight with engine 308 worked from Beardstown to Vermont side trip to Astoria and then all the way to Roseville and back to Beardstown), Peoria to Galesburg Sub, Fairview and Lewiston Sub (Fairview to South Liverpool) and the Buda and Vermont Subdivision
The train we are looking for ran that day as a work extra on duty at 10 AM in Canton using motor 9405-B having been rebuilt with a cab in 1954. The sheet does not show them departing Canton(CO)((telegraph call)) until 140Pm working Norris(NS)150-202 Farmington(FA) 217-230 and arriving Yates City(CD) at 235 with 3-2- 290 departing at 330 with 2-45-1000(loads-empties-tons) Elmwood(WD) 339-347 then must have done some kind of work as did not get to Bradford until 935 Pm with 1-3-150 and departed at 1000 Pm with 4-0-320 WD 1247-1255AM CD arrived at 1:50 with 23-0-1852 and out 1:25 W/C(waycar lite) and slid into home plate at Canton at 1:55AM W/C relieved at 1:59 (the 16 hour rule was in effect and would have died at 2:00AM.
John Mitchell's Bulletin 35 covered the Illinois Coal Fields South of Beardstown. This sheet covers the Coal Fields North of Beardstown With a lot of coal dumped in South Liverpool.
When your ready Charlie I think I can do a pretty good small Bulletin
Dave this has a train to Roseville might be able to shoehorn into the material you have now
Pete here are some items for your list. Telegraph Calls often used to abbreviate for calls and notations. Somewhere I have a whole list if you are interested.
Steve in SC
Thanks, Steven!
That narrows my search a little.
David P. Jordan
Dunlap, Illinois
>David
>My April '46 Official Guide shows Daily except Sunday Mixed train Buda to Yates City and Yates City to Peoria. Looks like the job worked out of Buda 6:50 AM >out of Buda and Yates City 9:40-2:50 back into Buda 5:00PM
>Oct. 1955 shows Mixed Service and it looks like the job may have come out of Galesburg or Yates City Yates City 11:00 AM Buda 2:00-2:20 Schedules in the GT->Peoria do not jive.
>April 1958 just shows Mixed train service Consult agent No times shown
>Would be neat on a model railroad to change locations where jobs worked out of and then maybe even change them to run in the opposite direction
>Steve in SC
|
__._,_.___
![]()
__,_._,___
|