To: | <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] VO-1000 details |
From: | "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:25:54 +1300 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echo; t=1354249551; bh=DsmabuetXh1OGTMgyccuLEyXik1NqdQfQWBfPiZJVak=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered:X-Cloudmark-SP-Result:X-IronPort-AV:X-Received:Message-ID:To:References:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aDtdBf2JmLnD5gztWGe21muLmgHRf5gAqh+XUAeYVLklBam7Tj7XB0ysBeqHHaQCl3egKTgmF5TrX8CIMkjTXzXKbSjwGGByuxXmf3MKugwIsDkVn6ExmdISYhIbeJ+iQWkILlm8PrhDIIR9lH5pHq+4RR/hw3Z9zptD/zxD6Vw= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echo; d=yahoogroups.com; b=mjbEqiM2FFxct8Y2/ITh3i0w8euOm7WHQOp8yz8cK0afVg3TkuBnGbDGjMAd1ecSr+UHDEbPrw70PBQvLG5vwXffoxTPKVS+SIlXESqqwhRR/LyFuy3m/Jw6aOCY7JoKZdYMEJ8cDfG/QK7kRvM1Aw3xYbpejsAjhVbXNs62vtw=; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <k99bcg+c30l@eGroups.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
John The question of stacks has been the subject of considerable discussion over the years. The last listing (some time ago, since when more photos have no doubt appeared) showed - VO-1000s that were equipped with the 4 stacks: #9350, 9351, 9352, 9353, 9354, 9355, 9356, 9357, 9358, 9359, 9360, 9361, 9362, 9363, 9364, 9365, 9366, 9377, 9378. The following VO-1000s retained the single stack: #9367, 9368, 9369, 9370, 9371, 9372, 9373, 9374, 9375, 9376, 9379. I'll send you my accumulated e-mails on the subject, but they only covers exhausts. Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "jonnyo55" <johnnyo55@hotmail.com> To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 5:06 PM Subject: [CBQ] VO-1000 details > Hello to all. I'm detailing (in HO) one of the Stewart VO-1000 locos, and > was wondering if anyone had tabulated which of these > locos had the four stack treatment installed. Ideally, I'd like the maximum > amount of "stuff" (exhaust stacks, wagon wheel > antenna, train control box, generator, etc.) atop the hood. The model is > factory numbered #9355, and, all things being equal, I'd > rather not renumber, but it's not beyond my capabilities to do so. Any info > received is highly appreciated...thanks! >> John O'Connell > > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] VO-1000 details, jonnyo55 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CBQ] Fw: hello, Don Nymann |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] VO-1000 details, jonnyo55 |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Re: VO-1000 details, Nelson Moyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |