To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Rates (was Chapin) |
From: | "John" <cbqrr47@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:12:54 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echo; t=1352056377; bh=oBwx2z2UmZ7CydRsd3pmPA2rLkAlFukcf34OgZ0LtiU=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rTubO59biKAzLbnRVXC259obI3bVAkBHRgZvRJPuaMk0UfOzpx7fseyFpUNMM4R7nxETQqh5pcnXsJ6I5fCP/WmtoPyCxy5rqGRUcfHTaS/yTYlFR3kvk2aAlkSsOVEbKwhjSKqyVDca/duZuH/v5WHfET2rOXC7yVSg1d/hpv0= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echo; d=yahoogroups.com; b=MqCnT0nrgBD2/JaYBsQyeW2gcKclRogq8/T5wxn4PXmJRAehJC2UDh0ko85+zierlDUuNJWTsPrbPi/mGsCcJriVeoVxrYpkMWepCOVjq0l236jA9GhVY0JeULeDgvXwiosWcrxHXalDjcVSJjXQcVpGyHUH/yKVMlRXYDcJT6A=; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
There were basically three kinds of rates. Class rates were based on the "Class" of the freight being shipped, it's weight, and standard mileage from a table showing the shortest mileage between the points. A commodity rate was a rate theoriticaly based on the cost of providing the service and a reasonable rate of return on the capital required to provide the service and applied to all shippers using the same service i.e. the same commodity under the same conditions between the same points. A joint rate was special commodity rate negotiated between two or more railroads (in some cases railroads and motor or water carriers). It might have or might have not specifed the routing. If it did the carrier with the longest road haul was in better position to ask for a greater rate division. Sometimes the shipper would specify the routing before they got a rate quote. If the interchange point was not included in the joint tariff, short hauling was not issue, indeed a smart railroad dumped the traffic at the first available interchange point. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Re: Chapin, John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Ad with Q E7 in GN paint style, Charlie Vlk |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Scale Drawings, georgecrawfordsr |
Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Contact me off list, BIGFOOT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |