|
Talking about rates. They are based on tonnage. So when I first got the ADM job I looked at the tonnage we were getting paid for and it was based on a little geep. But I was sure the trains were being pulled by SD's and higher HP thus more weight. I talked to the guy I was doing the reports for and he told me get him the figures. So I went thru my old X2200S and found the rosters and that way found the tonnage for the locomotives. So for each train I had to figure out the tonnage for the locomotive consist and add that to the train tonnage to get the right tonnage. BN had been losing millions each month. So management cut the job off.
Then they moved us to Texas where for the first time and all the jobs moved to Texas first were the old CB&Q jobs all in one office before any of the NP or GN jobs. Steve in SC From: "fhc925@frontier.com" <fhc925@frontier.com> To: "CBQ@yahoogroups.com" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sat, October 20, 2012 8:53:34 AM Subject: Re: [CBQ] SP trackage rights The BN-SP trackage rights agreement between KC and Chicago dates from about 1986 or so. As I understand it that all of the trackage rights agreements between the BNSF and the UP as a result of the UP-SP merger are based on this contract and it is not cheap. The rates are subject to an annual adjustment. Fred Crissey From: James Vivian <jvivian765@yahoo.com>
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 4:59 PM Subject: [CBQ] SP trackage rights Does anyone know how/where the SP gained access from the west to run
eastward on the Mendota Sub. and when this arrangement came into being? I know this must have carried over into the UP merger as I have have seen run-through stack trains in the fairly recent past. __._,_.___
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |