To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Need some help |
From: | jameskoretsky@comcast.net |
Date: | Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:54:33 +0000 (UTC) |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1331351675; bh=yw0DGO1tYJhX2HqK+fRhArkUbfG8bWPdRyEAzLybwKk=; h=Received:Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Kszo42uWmbw9H+unFbfVxL9BxMNAnsimP1J8XII75G5BR/3nNquRk+B+UQCBElOVbAQrdSRWqQN+vMpOYJnY/4v5pGs5W5VRTSExoY+fvlUnL2yN9cGpS2ILm1DbF3wO |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=pGazzELeQ20QgyuISFW88sIBszxg02dqKIL45ej22qk51/4EscEB+8UsHqCjM2Ta1fiJJd0opYBOuhh8LCTnOYaIyUAQhQ1Leu6eJwH8O8NckF8Soo4ruMmACm1yVWCM; |
In-reply-to: | <jjeh8j+6qp1@eGroups.com> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Mark, What you propose would be very close if not spot on for your needs. Code 100 was only ever used by the PRR and isn't even very common today. Code 83 Would have started coming in in the late 60's early 70's in wide spread use. The code 70 for mainlines and code 55 for yards sidings would be just perfect in my opinion. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "mark" <tavwot@yahoo.com> To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 10:19:47 PM Subject: [CBQ] Need some help This may be off topic but need some help.I'm working on a C&S standard gauge layout and trying to figure rail size for a 1920's-1940's era layout.The main power 2-8-2's,4-6-2's,and 2-8-0's.Some have said use code 100 flex track(that's all that's available locally).I'm leaning towards code 70 for main line,& code 55 for the yards and branch lines,but,I want to be as accurate as I can.Any help would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in advance Mark McCoy tavwot@yahoo.com ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [CBQ] Looking for St. Joseph Div TT's and information on Armour, Mo, GLEN HAUG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Need some help, Cy Svobodny |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Need some help, mark |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Need some help, Cy Svobodny |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |