To: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] Re: Interesting Discovery |
From: | "Jonathan Harris" <jonathanharris@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Sun, 25 Dec 2011 17:17:26 -0000 |
Delivered-to: | unknown |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1324833450; bh=YTWgyEWpyEMJ0io/gl00ibVTDc72x5+3mwfq9cBFzPg=; h=Received:Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=uwL+SsoHL/A/RLP2TiHh7p+ZJizafOXm+trxbSIp8oGOalWYt7lJnvK0uZ+Xqp7FEj8Rn+RQ9oOADWXKa+cihtEzRBWkIn+9ZWbxXmECZG9lzK9t7SpMk25z+s5vJldp |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=oRYjv0237VpwtZvC2ge0Cc4SaiY3FySwZhZPyuP7SR+YheN3revYoPNgxVEYW4t3zhvvkYe2GycDUHvStrdA0i/FCaFjZO7RKYOmZx0cCV2dOll66VWxH9hr/jYEpMy5; |
In-reply-to: | <KGEBKGPLHMDMEJMKKJGOKEOKKKAA.dave_lotz@bellsouth.net> |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
User-agent: | eGroups-EW/0.82 |
What a beauty. When you consider its frailty and realize this was probably close to state of the art for 1868, it makes you better appreciate what a daunting obstacle that river was. Wonder what the bridge's Cooper rating was (or would have been). --- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Lotz" <Dave_Lotz@...> wrote: > > Hi All, > > A week or so ago, Bill Ewinger sent me some images that Gary Seifken had > sent him. They are photos of a remaining portion of the ORIGINAL 1868 CB&Q > Mississippi River bridge at Burlington!!! It is said to have been floated > upriver, shortened, and placed in its current position in 1891. I've > compared it to the images I have of the original bridge and it is a match. > Here is the link for all to view: > http://www.johnweeks.com/river_mississippi/pagesB/umissBR14.html > > Dave > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Interesting Discovery, MICHAEL PANNELL |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Interesting Discovery, Kenneth Martin |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Interesting Discovery, MICHAEL PANNELL |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Interesting Discovery, Kenneth Martin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |