BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[CBQ] E7 9949

from [Duncan Cameron] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [CBQ] E7 9949
From: Duncan Cameron <d.cameron@sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:57:57 -0500
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1323845884; bh=bX6GSQDwG9yk9qXenbLFqcGke0aWIZrPeD9oT04KduE=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Originating-Email:Message-ID:X-Received:To:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-OriginalArrivalTime:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=s18nggcBfflGX7Ara71c2GwslbQ49Y23ad6EUfxqIg1314Atni8h+nmOgu1H9BKNHOlCOoUVbkG8FTBXncfzhvbYJPyu8zM8X/m5vODObOL+csnfGvoJa2j+Be10X3cb
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=P8E9cOOQW3XDNwPHej5outV1NtQCDn75I1/sAjkfLCuXGNp6Lwrd7jf47qWHEKPJjg7mOMx0BTnO/llhKYp2kWEqwgp98M1S+209TPJFb0exwEkRlq4xthpeb9169fG4;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


I've been going through some of the locomotive assignment rosters I have and noticed that between 1950-1958 the Hannibal division has one E7 assigned to it, #9949.  Now this motor was an odd one already because of its number.  It was the only one of the E7s not to have an A or B attached to its number, and was not numbered sequentially with the rest.  It even shared a number with an E8 or 9 (can't remember which right now).  But my question has to do with why this one motor was assigned to the Hannibal division.  I've located one photo of it pulling train #12 into St. Louis in the early 1950s, but other E7s pulled this train as well and none were assigned to Hannibal.  Anyone have any ideas?
Duncan Cameron


__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [CBQ], John Manion
Next by Date:  [CBQ] Re: E7 9949, thommack
Previous by Thread:  [CBQ], ANDREW KOETZ
Next by Thread:  [CBQ] Re: E7 9949, thommack
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]