To: | "CBQ List" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CBQ] First motor car |
From: | "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz> |
Date: | Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:39:49 +1300 |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1287805199; bh=CmEORxiKgUoGlAU6uvHibEpuh6NOUhxtE5SeeAhx0ds=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:X-IronPort-AV:X-Received:Message-ID:To:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Originating-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=paFSxBs2tjG9VGbmzq/9h9xsEZ9s8iYlTwj7RQ9lkjGVNg13TlcDh4MfDFtp0OCcOjB480/my8hP5VQ4z1qF95+o+YGfhbOELU2nyvP5pqlwdrAvG/EMhZVPGvmxuB7L |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=CL8688ibBir4G804x45fzoNkLLKCMtf+NKxKDQB+e29oZE+rup0omV8JAb6cHS0m3+ueCVKuFYYwAcLtR1sQnIKeCZ0GnBgqOeyHom/TdttYlM+F79AMhJNwdqD8kT0J; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
We had a brief discussion back in August about the first (possibly first) gasoline motor car. I've now found the following piece in an article (American Engineer & Railroad Journal Sept. 1905 page 335) about motor cars, discussing the different motive power options and costings of motor car operation. "The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway has recently built a 225-h.p. gasoline electric motor car designed to haul a trailer for carrying passengers, the motor car itself being used for the power equipment, mail and baggage. A test of this car was made recently, but as yet we have no figures on the actual cost of operation." Presuming this to be a reference to the same piece of equipment, it confirms that this was railway equipment as opposed to a converted road vehicle. Needless to say, if I find any published reports on the test, I'll let you know. Rupert Gamlen Auckland NZ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] re: FDR signed menu, ANDREW KOETZ |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CBQ] First motor car, Duncan Cameron |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] re: FDR signed menu, ANDREW KOETZ |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] First motor car, Duncan Cameron |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |