BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[CBQ] First motor car

To: "CBQ List" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [CBQ] First motor car
From: "Rupert & Maureen" <gamlenz@ihug.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:39:49 +1300
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1287805199; bh=CmEORxiKgUoGlAU6uvHibEpuh6NOUhxtE5SeeAhx0ds=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered:X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:X-IronPort-AV:X-Received:Message-ID:To:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Originating-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=paFSxBs2tjG9VGbmzq/9h9xsEZ9s8iYlTwj7RQ9lkjGVNg13TlcDh4MfDFtp0OCcOjB480/my8hP5VQ4z1qF95+o+YGfhbOELU2nyvP5pqlwdrAvG/EMhZVPGvmxuB7L
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=CL8688ibBir4G804x45fzoNkLLKCMtf+NKxKDQB+e29oZE+rup0omV8JAb6cHS0m3+ueCVKuFYYwAcLtR1sQnIKeCZ0GnBgqOeyHom/TdttYlM+F79AMhJNwdqD8kT0J;
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
We had a brief discussion back in August about the first (possibly first) 
gasoline motor car.  I've now found the following piece in an article (American 
Engineer & Railroad Journal Sept. 1905 page 335) about motor cars, discussing 
the different motive power options and costings of motor car operation.

"The Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway has recently built a 225-h.p. 
gasoline electric motor car designed to haul a trailer for carrying passengers, 
the motor car itself being used for the power equipment, mail and baggage.  A 
test of this car was made recently, but as yet we have no figures on the actual 
cost of operation."



Presuming this to be a reference to the same piece of equipment, it confirms 
that this was railway equipment as opposed to a converted road vehicle.  
Needless to say, if I find any published reports on the test, I'll let you know.



Rupert Gamlen

Auckland NZ


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>