To: | <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CBQ] Barstow Followup |
From: | "Russ Strodtz" <normansen@groundcontrol.us> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:48:36 -0600 |
Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1236307750; bh=29x7hTdIvkHHV8LfmkCAGJWOZ5tULRysmcpyUu8es5E=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:References:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-DWNI-Authenticated-User:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y6Nu8yGgXYSJQw7cEoocOcZsRoh0RRCYEOh1Ln9pV17MnFqPVavvHsaru9Gxm9ZVLrDigvYZQlePKetM1tn/AJM056zGhosUZqfKD+QpWSjssf1xH5pTsxsG3dirwi4Q |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=p28b+208tY2alYEGi/7ZevgUUYCt3Qh2kXMts0r2Y0yYGJYtGYSN/8iuTGwzQ348EKNboRFjijmPW+zLeDl94MBpc2F//P2HnT+kJW1liMnz57of+JyDQqyjqmGyHp5u; |
List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
References: | <gopvmc+9sjv@eGroups.com> |
Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
Bob, I can say that receiving and delivering is done on the basis of the shippers. There were many companies that would do what meant would seem as rather odd connections. If that was what they wanted, that was what they got. Russ ----- Original Message ----- From: "herrick01" <herrick@krausonline.com> To: <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, 05 March, 2009 19:53 Subject: [CBQ] Barstow Followup > Russ and Leo, thank you very much for your very informative responses to > our question about 64/69 and Barstow. > > Here's the followup question concerning interchange with the Rock Island > and the Milwaukee. The H.H. Copeland report on CB&Q Traffic Interchanged > in 1947 and 1948 that the BRHS mailed out awhile back shows that in 1948 > the Q delivered 7,500 cars to the Rock Island at Silvis Transfer and 5,600 > cars to the Milwaukee at East Moline, receiving 800 and 2,900 cars > respectively. > > Again, as non-professionals, we're wondering why so many cars were > delivered in the Quad Cities rather than Chicago as well as the nature of > the traffic delivered and received. > > Thanks, > > Bob Herrick > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CBQ] Barstow Followup, herrick01 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CBQ] Quad Cities Interchange 69/64, qutlx1 |
Previous by Thread: | [CBQ] Barstow Followup, herrick01 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Barstow Followup, STEVEN HOLDING |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |