BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Yard Work Week

To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Yard Work Week
From: Jpslhedgpeth@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:36:25 -0400
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=rpP+afydPiLREMy/4zPqC1TNA4aPwzT2J0Ql85x/qaOJf8IL9chGKhM31pUFjGpE38ZqdRQwnuK22cWvlQMSQpPyOxSQFjKtdudrm8Tvue+u/iuUYh53g3RZag9S8QoR;
In-reply-to: <c3d.359a9405.35943117@aol.com>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <c3d.359a9405.35943117@aol.com>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Leo

This has nothing directly to do with your question, but the matter did get me 
to thinking about a situation here on the Lincoln Division in the 1950's which 
"semi relates" to what your inquiring about and just for the opportunity of 
talking about some other "old stuff" here it is.

At Ravenna, NE...first crew change point west of Lincoln on what is now 
the"coal line" there worked a switch engine whose hours were 1:00am-9:00am.?? I 
think it worked 6 days (nights), but, apparently was bulletined as a 5 day job.
The job was crewed by Lincoln Division trainmen BRT.

The way it worked was the 3 man regular crew worked 6 days for five weeks and 
then had five days off taken one man at a time.?? When you got "stuck" on that 
job....all nights and no, or very little overtime off the extra board you were 
stuck there for three weeks, relieving each man for his 5 days off.? The relief 
was done off an extra board at Aurora, NE which existed in name only.? Since no 
one wanted to go on that night Ravenna engine the youngest man on the Lincoln 
extra board?(namely me) was "forced" to the Aurora extra board and then 
assigned to the RAvenna switch engine.

I got stuck on that job one week summer of 56 and two weeks summer 57....It was 
awful...Staying in an old non AC hotel, all night work...no OT.?? Here I was a 
college student trying to make as much money as I could and this was of course 
a "minimum day" thing...

The only time you could get a little OT was if there was a through freight 
train due in within 30 minutes of going off duty time 9:00am they had to hold 
you to change his W/C.

Pete




-----Original Message-----
From: qutlx1@aol.com
To: cbq@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 6:39 pm
Subject: [CBQ] Yard Work Week






In 1948 the yard work week was reduced to 5 days by contract agreement. Road 
work remained 5,6 or 7 days depending on how a job was "advertised".
I just picked up the 1918 "schedule"(agreement between the Q and 
BRT(Yardmen) hoping to find some points on work week..There were none.

Can anyone shed any light on yard work week prior to 1948? was it 6 or 7 
days ?
>From the Eola engine assignment book for 1953-55 its clear some jobs were 
still 6 days. The Alley in particular. My understanding is after 1948 a man 
could choose between a 5 day week and other schedules.

Leo Phillipp

**************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for 
fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>