Greg,
I must have been thinking of the BB issue on the Alco S2s. The
various books you cited must be where I am remembering seeing photos of
the VO-1000s with various stack combinations.
Scott Myers
________________________________
From: CBQ@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CBQ@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of graywolfs2
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 2:58 PM
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CBQ] Re: #2486 VO1000 Info
Simon, Roy, Scott, Bill, Jan,
In researching what information I have at hand, I can pass this
info
on to you about the VO-1000.
I was able to gather this info from 3-4 different sources in my
own "library" of CB&Q books I own.
This info comes from:
1. Burlington Route Color Pictorial Vol. 1 by Al Holck
pages 58-59
2. Burlington Route Color Pictorial Vol. 2 by Al Holck
page 22
3. CB&Q in Color Vol. 1 by Mike Spoor
page 17
4. CB&Q in Color Vol. 3 by Mike Spoor
pages 116-117
5. Hub of Burlington Lines West by A. Holck
page 138
Bill is correct about the back-pressure issue and over heating.
But
of the 30 VO-1000's owned by the "Q" only 17 were modified to a
4
stack design, and what I read, the modifications were done by
the
Burlington. The ATSF also had the same problems and used the
same "fix".
However, the VO-1000's were delivered in two (2) groups.
9350-9357
in October/November of 1943 and 9358-9379 in October/November of
1944. They rode on AAR trucks and had the De LaVergne 4 cycle
in-
line 8 cylinder engines.
The books state that most of the 4-stack engines (motors?) were
assigned to the St. Joe Division and worked out of Kansas City
(Murray Yard?).
I went to the Stewart web site and looked up the road numbers
that
they did the "Q" engines in, looked through the photos in the
above
mentioned books and came up with this:
9353 - 4 Stacks w/radio 6-1961(photo date) Murray Yard.
(1.)
9365 - 4 stacks w/radio 10-1960(photo date) St. Joe
(1.)
9355 - 4 stacks w/o radio 4-1967(photo date) Valdosta, GA.
(2.)
(The numbers in parentheses refer to the book the info comes
from,
see beginnig of the post.)
The VO-1000 lasted on the "Q" into the mid 60's when they were
traded in to GE as partial payment for new units (I presume GE
units). 11 of them were sold by GE topower short ACL, becoming
SCL
units upon the ACL-SBD merger in 1967 (hense the photo taken in
Valdosta, GA. this photo shows #9355 still in "Q" paint and
number).
One last bit of "Q" trivia in regards to the VO-1000's, they
were
the only units to have the yellow/red sill stripes reversed from
what the other hood/switcher engines had. On the VO-1000's the
yellow stripe was on top, with the red on the bottom. All the
rest
of the hood/switchers were red on top, yellow on the bottom (
and
yes, Stewart did that correctly!).
I also looked at my Bulletins, and there is no Bulletin
specifclly
covering the VO-1000. There is one covering the Alco S4
switchers
(diesel).
I hope this helps, and I highly recommend, if you can, to seek
out
and purchase the books I mention above, they are EXCELLENT
sources
of info and photos of the Burlington Route. The authors (Al and
Mike) put lots of hard work into getting the information they
put in
the books as correct as possible!
Greg K.
Minnesota
--- In CBQ@yahoogroups.com, clipperw@E... wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I believe all of the Q's Baldwin VO1000's were delivered on a
single
> order and they all originally had a single short stack near
the
rear of
> the hood. Those generally assigned to Kansas City and other
western
> point generally were modified to by the RR to the 4 stack
arrangement
> while, in general, those in the east including Chicago
continued
to
> operate with a single stack. Why, I am not sure. Supposedly,
the 4
> stack arrangement relieved an exhaust back pressure problem
that
was
> affecting diesel engine operation and maintenance. I am not
familiar
> enough with the Baldwin production to know whether they ever
delivered
> a 4 stack arrangement as original equipment. However, I recall
reading
> that the 4 stack modification was supported and possibly
developed
by
> Baldwin engineers. It is also possible that they came up with
another
> design change to correct the problem in production.
>
> Bill Barber
>
> On Friday, August 5, 2005, at 06:08 AM, CBQ@yahoogroups.com
wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:38:43 -0500
> > From: "Simon Griffin" <SIMON_GRIF@m...>
> > Subject: Re: Stewart VO1000
> >
> > Roy, I am no expert on this by any means. What I have read
suggests
> > that
> > there is not an easy answer to this, and I don't think that
there is a
> > definitive list for this. Evidently, the initial production
run
of
> > these
> > had a single low stack at the rear of the hood. Later ones
were
> > delivered
> > with 4 stacks. Earlier ones were modified to 4 stacks.
Apparently
> > not all
> > were modified however. Perhaps someone else has more
definitive
> > answers to
> > this. I searched the forum archive and the question was
asked
several
> > times
> > when the Stewart model came out, but I did not see any
conclusive
> > answer.
> >
> > Simon
________________________________
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
* Visit your group "CBQ
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ> " on the web.
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
________________________________
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
<font face=arial size=-1><a
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hvc99uo/M=362131.6882500.7825259.1493532/D=groups/S=1706043004:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1123281136/A=2889190/R=0/SIG=10r90krvo/*http://www.thebeehive.org
">Put more honey in your pocket. (money matters made easy) Welcome to the Sweet
Life - brought to you by One Economy</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|