BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

[BRHSlist] The Loss Of Passengers, Herb Wallace, and Louis Menk

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [BRHSlist] The Loss Of Passengers, Herb Wallace, and Louis Menk
From: "Ed DeRouin" <Ed@pixelspublishing.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 21:03:38 -0000
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:BRHSlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com; contact BRHSlist-owner@yahoogroups.com
Reply-to: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
Listers:

I have read the posts with interest and have the following 
thoughts. As fans of the Burlington, we rejoice our histories and 
embrace what we believe to be most admirable about the CB&Q. 
>From what I have heard from many sources, I whole-heartedly 
agree that Heb Wallace was an excellent  GPM. And, I have 
heard from many their dislike for Louis Menk.

As railfans, we should sometimes stepback and look at history 
from various perspectives. Most companies operate with people 
with various viewpoints. Those performing the daily tasks of 
getting trains over the road rarely agree with those charged with 
the task of satisfying the shareholder. That is okay; that is why 
work is a four letter word.

>From my research into the history of Chicago Union Station, I 
came away with a much different perspective than when I started 
the effort. In fact, after the clinic this spring, I was asked by a PRR 
fan why I picked on the Pennsy. 

That gave me something to think about. I concluded that the PRR 
I witnessed in the early 1960's was not  the PRR he recalled 
from the mid to late 1950's What changed?

The eastern roads were hit with the loss of passengers before 
the western roads, that is what. The PRR was attempting to 
stave its losses before the other roads of CUS. Hence, the 
Cinncy and lesser E-W trains lost  their glow in the late 1950's - 
or earlier.

What does this have to do with the arguements supporting Herb 
Wallace and Louis Menk. They were on a collison course. The 
shareholders wanted a person to end passenger service. It is 
hard to argue with the numbers. Americans were fleeing from 
the trains to the road and the air. The analysis is complex and 
often extremists on either side inflate a number for their sake, 
but over time, the facts are hard to refute.

Now, don't start attacking me, I like the passenger trains too. But 
as a student of history, I have to place many items into context 
and look at  the facts from several perspectives, not just the ones 
I want to defend.

By 1966, the end of the intercity passenger train was in sight, at 
least in most board rooms. The directors of a corporation are 
charged with the responsibility of sustaining the corporation. If 
orders are given to end a segment of the business because no 
growth and only losses are predicted, they act, regardless of 
personal feelings or wishes.

While Herb is remembered by many for doing an excellent job 
and Louis is reviled, let's keep in mind that they were both 
railroaders with a job to do in an extremely contentious period. If 
you don't believe how contentious the era was, reread the earlier 
posts and look at the emotion.

I regret not having met or interviewing Herb. It is a sad day.

Regards,

Ed DeRouin     


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. 
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/8ZCslB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>