There are a lot of us in the same boat
I just do not worry about it
sjh
----- Original Message -----
From: Roy Quick <quicktax@e...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Step Off
> I agree. Have not been able to get to the files area and am a member of
BRHS
> and signed up for the Yahoo group.
>
> Roy Quick
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Norm_Andersen" <Norm_Andersen@m...>
> To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 11:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Step Off
>
>
> > I totally give up with this infernal $%&@# Yahoo Groups cra-! No matter
> how
> > I try Yahoo Groups does NOT work for me even though I am a member and
have
> > entered the correct ID and password. Can somebody give me David Lotz'
> email
> > address?
> >
> > Steamin and thanks,
> >
> > Norm Andersen
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <PSHedgpeth@a...>
> > To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:28 AM
> > Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Step Off
> >
> >
> > > Leo
> > >
> > > Thanks re your elucidation on the step on-step off arrangement. I
don't
> > > recall seeing the treatise a year ago, so appreciate your doing it
> again.
> > >
> > > What you said would exactly match the St. Joe arrangement. I don't
know
> > for
> > > sure, but apparently Kansas City was the originating terminal and
final
> > > terminal for the Lincoln, Omaha, St. Joe KC trains...20-21, 26-27,
> 22-23,
> > > 41-42,43-44. The arrangement would have worked the same way. Crews
> would
> > > step on at St. Joe and work to KC and then have a quick turn back
rather
> > than
> > > deadheading from St. Joe to KC then working back, and working to KC
and
> > > deadheading back to St. Joe the crew's home terminal.
> > >
> > > I always understood that this was an "official" arrangement, but
> > apparently
> > > it wasn't, but as you say...it was winked at as long as "nothing
> > happened".
> > >
> > > It kind of validates my oft expressed opinion that railroaders of
> > yesteryear
> > > were pretty much "self supervised" and not micromanaged as seems to be
> the
> > > case today.
> > >
> > > Pete
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
|