BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Step Off

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Step Off
From: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@y...>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <1a5.e97525.29f023f4@a...>
Pete

Amen to that. Forty years ago some employees went
months without ever seeing an offical and the system
worked really well! Today, people who don't know a cut
lever from a tie plate tell working railroaders every
switch move to make.

John D. Mitchell, Jr.
--- PSHedgpeth@a... wrote:
> Leo
> 
> Thanks re your elucidation on the step on-step off
> arrangement. I don't 
> recall seeing the treatise a year ago, so appreciate
> your doing it again.
> 
> What you said would exactly match the St. Joe
> arrangement. I don't know for 
> sure, but apparently Kansas City was the originating
> terminal and final 
> terminal for the Lincoln, Omaha, St. Joe KC
> trains...20-21, 26-27, 22-23, 
> 41-42,43-44. The arrangement would have worked the
> same way. Crews would 
> step on at St. Joe and work to KC and then have a
> quick turn back rather than 
> deadheading from St. Joe to KC then working back,
> and working to KC and 
> deadheading back to St. Joe the crew's home
> terminal.
> 
> I always understood that this was an "official"
> arrangement, but apparently 
> it wasn't, but as you say...it was winked at as long
> as "nothing happened". 
> 
> It kind of validates my oft expressed opinion that
> railroaders of yesteryear 
> were pretty much "self supervised" and not
> micromanaged as seems to be the 
> case today.
> 
> Pete
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>