Bob
You should have used what we used on the train sheets
S Ski, O Ski etc
sjh
----- Original Message -----
From: <amtrak347@a...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Re: Flatlanders???
> In a message dated 2/1/02 6:18:47 PM Central Standard Time,
hogger41@a...
> writes:
>
>
> > If I remember right they were mu'd.
> >
> > Gary O.
> >
> > PS.......... RJ, do you remember if they were mu'd?
> >
> >
> >
>
> I don't remember, but according to my time book we were ordered for 7:00PM
> Friday, March 2, 1979, at Clyde with three switch engines for Eola - 558
(ex
> Q 9406A), 525 (ex Q 9228) and 536 (ex Q 9239). The TR-2 was MUable but
the
> two NW-2's were not. Left Clyde at 8:40PM (25mins ITD on a lite engine!)
> were "runaround" by the crew on 2/85 (ord 7:15PM dep 8:27PM) stalled just
> west of Prospect Ave. in Clarendon Hills. Had you go back to the 525 so
we
> could "doublehead" over Westmont. I think you stayed on the 525 until we
> arrived at Eola at 9:58PM; tied-up at 10:40PM (42mins FTD). It was your
9th
> student engineer trip with me. It appears that it took me nine trips to
> learn how to spell your last name correctly; back then I think we were
using
> Landorf's "moniker" for you anyway. Nine years (to the day!) of BN's
"Tender
> Loving Care" sure took its toll on all "Q" power; thank you, Louis W.
Menk,
> "the Fink".
>
> R"J"
>
> PS - 9hrs 50mins later, we were relieving #364 at Sugar Grove. Still
trying
> to find the trip with the "fusee" incident for later posting to the
"List".
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
|