The underscore prefixing the e-mail address is another indication of Our
Favorite Virus Of the Last Few Days. It automatically adds the underscore
while perpetrating itself.
Norm Metcalf
From: David E. Lotz <Dave_Lotz@m...>
To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:54 AM
Subject: [BRHSlist] RE: EMAIL WITH ATTACHMENT ON LIST
> Thanks for sending the html of your mailbox. I see the first email with
the
> virus was from Tom on 11/30. It is easily recognizable with the
underscore
> preceding Tom's email address. (_twhitt@...) I too see Rupert's of
12/1 -
> also with the underscore. The subject line says that it is in reference
to
> a BRHSlist posting but that does not mean that it was delivered from the
> BRHSlist server. The only way to tell would be to look at the email
header
> and look at the TO field. This is exactly what I was trying to clear up
> with my post, the presence of "BRHSlist" prefix on the subject line does
not
> mean it was mailed through the list server.
> Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: KPMF16@a... [mailto:KPMF16@a...]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:53 AM
> To: dave_lotz@m...
> Subject: EMAIL WITH ATTACHMENT ON LIST
> Dave,
> Perhaps this will help clear up what some of us on the list are talking
> about. I've attached a download of my old mail file and it shows two of
the
> emails with attachments that I and others on the BRHSlist may have
received.
> The first was from Tom Whit on 11/30, and the second was from Rupert on
Dec.
> 1. The one from Rupert does not have the BRHS prefix.
> I also received another from d.cameron after the one from Rupert and
deleted
> it. I can't recall if it had the BRHSlist prefix, but thought it did. I
> haven't received any more of this type of email since then.
> Hope this helps clear up the confusion. I can understand your fierce
> defense of the workings of the list since you have the responsibility of
> being the moderator.
> Ken Thompson
|