BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Commercial Postings on BRHSlist

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Commercial Postings on BRHSlist
From: wulrich@a...
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:08:07 -0000
In-reply-to: <v01510102b82b3fd53e94@[158.252.216.56]>
User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
--- In BRHSlist@y..., jonathanharris@e... wrote:
> Dave and List --
> 
> Thanks for taking this poll. I'm all in favor of polls and of 
majority
> rule, but a little more clarification and maybe some 
discussion/debate
> might help us make a better decision. (I just voted but felt I did 
so in
> brute ignorance.... Since it says we can change our votes right up 
to the
> cut-off date, maybe it's not too late.)
> 
> In the four months I've been a subscriber, I've felt able to get 
plenty of
> commercial information off both the list and the BRHS web site, 
through its
> Modelers Depot
> 
> How would any of this change if more/fewer commercial postings were
> allowed? What would "commercial" postings look like? Can someone 
point to
> an example?
> 
> I also am a little concerned about how votes will be tallied in 
this poll.
> A person who votes for "no postings," for instance, would probably 
be
> happier (as a 2nd choice) with a policy allowing a select subset 
("only
> approved by list moderator" or "only Burlington-related") than with 
a
> policy of unrestricted postings. Yet if those three choices ("none,
> "moderator-approved only" and "Burlington only") each garnered 20% 
of the
> vote while "unrestricted" received 25%, "unrestricted" presumably 
would
> win. Maybe there should be a run-off between the top two vote-
getters to
> minimize the possibility of such distortions. That way, whatever 
wins will
> have at least 50% approval.
> 
> If we do allow (more) commercial postings, I would only ask that we 
observe
> the basic rules of common courtesy and common sense: that our 
moderator
> (whom I completely trust) be open and even-handed; that there be 
some
> filter to prevent an individual or company from saturation bombing 
or
> posting the same information over and over; that we demand rigorous
> standards of business ethics for those who offer goods or services 
through
> these posts; and that we always remain open to tweaking or revising
> whatever policy we adopt if a significant number among us feel it 
is not
> working.
> 
> Jonathan
> -------------



excellent points jonathan. if there was at catagory of "limited 
advertising - burlington lines only and moderator approved" i would 
change my vote in a heartbeat.

warren


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>