BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Cantilever Signal Bridges

To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Cantilever Signal Bridges
From: Ryhawk181@a...
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:43:45 EDT
Thanks for the info. I never knew what that lone signal was for. 

Ryan Gash
Oak Park,IL

In a message dated 07/12/2001 4:37:59 Central Daylight Time, 
hold-on@s... writes:


> Subj:Re: [BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Cantilever Signal Bridges
> Date:07/12/2001 4:37:59 Central Daylight Time
> From: hold-on@s... (Steven Holding)
> Reply-to: <A 
> HREF="mailto:BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com";>BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com</A>
> To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ryan and others
> That signal was the first westward signal west of LaVergne at MP9.57 and was
> used to protect the hand throw switch at the east end of Congress Park.
> Often called a starting signal it allowed the use of the plant at LaVergne
> for a switch move and yet you could also use the East End of the Yard at
> Congress Park for a switch move or run around. You always had to remember
> to also punch that signal when someone left the yard at Cicero otherwise
> they would not have a signal. It added flexibility to the operations. A
> little like the hand throw crossover at Maple Ave in Brookfield between Main
> 2 and 3. A train could be sitting on Main 2 sitting out cars on the South
> Wye at Congress Park and still run an eastbound train thru the plant at
> Congress Park. The eastbound on Main 3 got a Lunar aspect meaning proceed
> at Restricted Speed. Which reads "Proceed prepared to stop short of train,
> engine, sbstruction, or switch not properly lined, looking out for broken
> rail or anything that may require the speed of a train or engine to be
> reduced, but not exceeding 20 MPH." Once the train on main two finished his
> setout and restored the switch to normal and locked it up the cab signals
> would clear (on Passenger Trains) and a suburban train could then proceed at
> normal speed. Lunar signals were also great for switching moves like a
> pickup at Eola for letting the head end of the train back against its self.
> Glen this one does show up on the Alignment Charts as CANT SIG BR 9.57
> The Galesburg bridge shows as CANT SIG BR 163.08
> SJH
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Ryhawk181@a...>
> To: <BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Cantilever Signal Bridges
> 
> 
> >
> > I remember seeing the cantilever signal in Berwyn,IL. It only held one
> > signal facing west on the westbound track. It was removed several years
> ago
> > but I think the foundation is still in place.
> >
> > Ryan Gash
> > Oak Park,IL
> >
> > > Subj:[BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Cantilever Signal Bridges
> > > Date:07/10/2001 4:35:38 Central Daylight Time
> > > From: glenehaug@m...
> > > Reply-to: <A
> HREF="mailto:BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com";>BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
> > > To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In BRHSlist@y..., "David Ulibarri" <davidulibarri@g...> wrote:
> > > > I have enjoyed reading the posts about CB&Q's cantilever signal
> > > > bridges...Also, how does one model this signal bridge in HO Scale?
> > >
> > > Dave, I am actually working on research and some sketches that would
> > > help someone model the Q signal bridges. That is why I have been
> > > asking questions from time to time. Although I have found a lot of
> > > old Q signal bridge drawings, there are some "holes" in the
> > > information, like Aurora to St. Paul, and across Iowa.
> > >
> > > I can tell you that the specific bridge you asked about at Council
> > > Bluffs is gone. All of the cantilevers at Council Bluffs and Pacific
> > > Jct. have been removed, but the foundations are still in, as these
> > > were very large and probably too expensive to take out.
> > >
> > > I haven't figured out how to distribute this information to those who
> > > want to use it. It is probably too much information to include all
> > > of it with any future article on signaling, but it could be
> > > distributed hard copy or on CD. And I also need to make it a little
> > > more complete. Having said that, there are a lot of bridges that I
> > > have complete information on, and could send it out now if someone
> > > wants to model a particular bridge.
> > >
> > > Glen Haug
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
> Return-Path: <
> sentto-17127-9200-994930591-Ryhawk181=aol.com@r...>
> Received: from rly-xd02.mx.aol.com (rly-xd02.mail.aol.com 
> [172.20.105.167]) by air-xd02.mail.aol.com (v79.27) with ESMTP id 
> MAILINXD24-0712053759; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 05:37:59 -0400
> Received: from hn.egroups.com (hn.egroups.com [208.50.99.199]) by 
> rly-xd02.mx.aol.com (v79.20) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXD25-0712053737; Thu, 
> 12 Jul 2001 05:37:37 -0400
> X-eGroups-Return: 
> sentto-17127-9200-994930591-Ryhawk181=aol.com@r...
> Received: from [10.1.4.54] by hn.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 Jul 2001 
> 09:36:32 -0000
> X-Sender: hold-on@s...
> X-Apparently-To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
> Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 12 Jul 2001 09:36:30 -0000
> Received: (qmail 17436 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2001 09:36:30 -0000
> Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Jul 
> 2001 09:36:30 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net) (151.164.30.28) by 
> mta1 with SMTP; 12 Jul 2001 09:36:30 -0000
> Received: from holding ([216.62.112.226]) by mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun 
> Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.03.23.18.03.p10) with SMTP id <
> 0GGC00EYLTDJNL@m...> for BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 
> 12 Jul 2001 04:36:57 -0500 (CDT)
> To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
> Message-id: <003401c10ab6$d18403a0$e2703ed8@h...>
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
> References: <10c.28971e8.287e7787@a...>
> X-Priority: 3
> From: Steven Holding <hold-on@s...>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Mailing-List: list BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com; contact 
> BRHSlist-owner@yahoogroups.com
> Delivered-To: mailing list BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:BRHSlist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:24:45 -0500
> Reply-To: BRHSlist@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [BRHSlist] Re: CB&Q Cantilever Signal Bridges
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> 
> 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>