While I would be happy to set up a group for the C&S & the FW&D and Lines
West, i wonder if it is needed.
I haven't seen anyone complain about the content when there are notes on
these topics, and I'm not sure they would be un-welcome. I hate to see
splintered groups, because topics can be started on a very finite scope and
become quite broad in nature. So, the answer to that is to subscribe to
both groups. Which somewhat defeats the purpose.
I could see topics ranging from the Denver Zephyr, to the Sam Houston or
texas Zephyrs starting on the FW&D & C&S site be of common interest. Or
the Colorados. Or the C&S 2-8-0s...
Is there a compelling need? Will there be enough traffic? Will there be
problems with information being in one when both would beneift?
|