BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Texas Zephyr Southbound Amarillo-Dallas Sleeper Summer 1961

To: CBQ@groups.io
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Texas Zephyr Southbound Amarillo-Dallas Sleeper Summer 1961
From: "Stephen Levine via groups.io" <sjl_prodigynet=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:49:26 -0600
Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of groups.io designates 66.175.222.108 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounce+11863+66267+703214+1544929@groups.io; dmarc=pass header.from=<sjl_prodigynet=yahoo.com@groups.io> (p=none dis=none)
Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1708048183; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:Date:From:From:In-Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Reply-To:Reply-To:References:Sender:Subject:Subject:To:To:Message-Id:Cc; bh=iWHlm8ulX1+p24wXiuu6g4LrQ1td5P08kyVJenbwuCc=; b=oFvUuMlfRwt4+nF7dzI4mwdqhdCjG5FfAd5nXAuzPGzBYU9AoggwvWupagad0T0xsKp2qlqKH9dVxn4EcnhB4GG1oaUtiqiQ5DsjRcToWWhjRA8KGHhDGfsmoX4ygLyFk++sdkotTLrctEaAnsHCbqXxSuhIoxjajmzc8PMkP6Y=
Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1708048183; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=gDRy3S8hR+goysud7pmF6InZ9eR+67pemIp/CHNE3GnTj5E3NUuuv5LCTGY46RPJ5AR5F7/JLIzyneyHxWmkn7ZeQKoou86UDLjmw2HJvFG4h3Th0+3VWCNkA8N2uDrgkwFky1bG3KMUy5Rmy7K35/BmKgbLp3rqGbETX32A4Dg=
Authentication-results: mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass; spf=pass (zohomail.com: domain of groups.io designates 66.175.222.108 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounce+11863+66267+703214+1544929@groups.io; dmarc=pass(p=none dis=none) header.from=groups.io
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=0h5udlGA/yKD6plyaE9qYqlr4szWlipSRqAnIqnW0GI=; c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io; h=From:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:Message-Id:References:In-Reply-To:To:Precedence:List-Subscribe:List-Help:Sender:List-Id:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:Reply-To:List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Unsubscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Length; s=20140610; t=1708048183; v=1; b=PVqv+poz3/+hhrsf9qg40Z1vxer1SkTdByEh/ASTyWFC0qgxGvtD920PMy8phb6/DPyyyBbG HiqIKNy3L6UbR3WZdKdYL6upzK+ahqiMvzr9PlJ00mEJcL+gtPPYFpPz1zuPPqPq/TwerIe7zmA n+6UiRVcHSyRP5tiOjYNxkFw=
In-reply-to: <17B42650E17EE106.24865@groups.io>
List-help: <mailto:CBQ+help@groups.io>
List-id: <CBQ.groups.io>
List-subscribe: <mailto:CBQ+subscribe@groups.io>
List-unsubscribe: <https://groups.io/g/CBQ/leave/1544929/703214/691670059/plugh>
List-unsubscribe-post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click
Mailing-list: list CBQ@groups.io; contact CBQ+owner@groups.io
References: <17B42650E17EE106.24865@groups.io>
Reply-to: CBQ@groups.io
Sender: CBQ@groups.io
I think I jumped the gun on blaming the positioning of the Amarillo-Dallas sleeper as contributing to its failure, for which I apologize.

According to the 1961 timetable, the southbound TZ was scheduled to arrive in Dallas at 7:35 AM. So it would not have been necessary for the sleeper’s passengers to access to the train’s food service.

In fact, being able to board a sleeper in the evening in Amarillo, have it picked up by the TZ around 11:20 pm after you’ve turned in, and arriving in Dallas just in time for breakfast, sounds quite attractive.  


On Feb 15, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Stephen Levine via groups.io <sjl_prodigynet=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

That makes sense. Of course, working against the car line would have been inaccessibility to the rest of the train, including the diner (“Golly, gee! The car’s brake line system is incompatible with the rest of the train, so it has to go in front by itself…”).

Thanks to all for your responses.



On Feb 15, 2024, at 1:31 PM, HOL WAGNER <holpennywagner@msn.com> wrote:


In response to the original query, I live on the wrong end of the system to have firsthand knowledge of what was going on on the Texas end, but it should be borne in mind that an 8/5 sleeper is a heavyweight car, most of them being in the "Clover" series, though there were two in the original 1940 Texas Zephyr consist:  one C&S and one FW&D, with the names "Castle Crest" and "Castle Range."  The former was purchased from Pullman by the C&S at the end of 1948, the latter by the FW&D.  But by 1961 only the FW&D car, "Castle Range," was still in Pullman lease and thus available for use.  

I referred the question to Bill Schultz to see what he might know about the operation, and here is his response:

Aside from the public timetable, I've found nothing to indicate what cars were assigned.  Pullman's 1961 list of cars includes 70 Clover-prefix 8/5s (47 cars leased and 23 owned outright by Pullman), which included FW&D Castle Range, Q 654 (ex-Clover Basin), and Q 659 (ex-Clover Veldt), so there were myriad possibilities.  To hold costs to a minimum, I'll suggest that one car - FW&D Castle Range - was used to protect the daily Dallas-Amarillo round-trip.  

At the time, No. 2 arrived in Amarillo at 9:05 p.m. (25-minute dwell), theoretically providing enough time to spot the car for early boarding at 9:30 p.m. (the same early boarding time previously observed for the Amarillo-Dallas car discontinued in '57.).  No. 1 departed at 11:40 p.m. following a 21-minute dwell, ample time to cut the sleeper into the train behind the RPO.  As a comparison, in the late '50s the Q operated a one-way St. Paul-Chicago set-out sleeper on the Black Hawk, deadheaded back to St. Paul every afternoon in the North Coast Limited in order to confine the operation (expense) to one car.  The assignment of two cars and labor expense of two porters to protect a maximum of 18 fares (one per section in the lower berth; in 1961, nobody sought upper-berth space) for the Amarillo-Dallas operation would've doomed the service from the start, and my bet is that FW&D's Transportation and Mechanical Departments were told to make this work with one car.

With no competing Amarillo-Dallas rail service, there was no obvious commercial reason for FW&D to establish the car.  Rather than a late-in-the-game magnanimous gesture by FW&D, I suspect it was done on an experimental basis to mollify influential local interests in Amarillo, most likely a big freight customer, with the understanding that it would be discontinued if it failed to attain a predetermined ridership threshold (and which FW&D knew all along it would).

And in fact the "Castle Range" was withdrawn from Pullman lease in August 1962.

Hope this offers the probable answer to the original question.

Hol

From: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io> on behalf of thomasad65a via groups.io <thomasad65a=yahoo.com@groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 12:19 AM
To: CBQ@groups.io <CBQ@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Texas Zephyr Southbound Amarillo-Dallas Sleeper Summer 1961
 
Attached is a page from the May 1954 system timetable.  It also shows an Amarillo to Dallas sleeper on southbound number 1.  However, note that it shows three sleepers arriving in Denver on northbound number 2, but only two sleepers leaving Denver on number 1.  Perhaps one sleeper was closed leaving Denver southbound, but then opened in Amarillo?  Does the 1961 timetable show the same situation?
<FW&D 'Castle Range,' Dallas, Tex., 12-1973, E.L. DeGolyer, Jr., photo.jpg>
_._,_._,_

Groups.io Links:

You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#66267) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [archives@nauer.org]

_._,_._,_
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>