BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CBQ] Early Railroads...

To: "CBQ@yahoogroups.com" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Early Railroads...
From: "Charlie Vlk cvlk@comcast.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:07:26 -0800
Authentication-results: mta1002.groups.mail.ne1.yahoo.com from=comcast.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=comcast.net; dkim=pass (ok)
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1452794858; bh=K8tD8pAx/yS9kb3/G7oO1FObkYtFO7KH6tUh4nQkWiI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:To:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=qBy+CyOlIaW0OLHQGD3gqavDSVAn7XyuIInkIqdLdjWreo/DVNZFbKOSM8tIre7VUCaAdXz8ZpSrWGE2YilPOs4tsuLw8VQwc9Su8DlT9ZgrZjp0KNeeByICwfL4hw2neZJQz8DWnkItZc1eFtdy3n4NO6P/pt7BiejGSeJ3DJM=
In-reply-to: <5697DABD.5090102@redtower.net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <5697DABD.5090102@redtower.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


Jan
The WW Baldwin histories give a complete story for each entity that became part of the Burlington
The individual companies were largely for purposes of construction and the backers were directly associated with the Q.  Sometimes though  it was done for competitive stealth.   
The Q got burnt directly building the first attempt to line (up the west side of the Mississippi) that impacted the overall finances of the corporation, so they really liked to keep new lines at an arms length until they were in operation.  
The changes in corporate name were mostly due to financing and not much in the way of shenanigans or bankruptcies.   
The Newberry has tons of material on the financial side of things and someone whose eyes don't glaze over at the mere mention of Sinking Funds and Bonds could better explain the issues you raise
Charlie Vlk

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 14, 2016, at 9:28 AM, "JK public@redtower.net [CBQ]" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 

In reading through my Corbin book, Across Iowa on the K&W and H&S Railroads, I was reminded of some questions I have had regarding early railroads, financing and building.

There are some good pages in there where Corbin describes some of the components that made up the two respective railroads, but some of the details (to me) seem to have been lost in time.
Perhaps someone here can share some insight...

So let me just state a few things which I think are incumbent upon understanding the situation, someone can add or correct any of these assumptions:
 

In reading through my Corbin book, Across Iowa on the K&W and H&S Railroads, I was reminded of some questions I have had regarding early railroads, financing and building.

There are some good pages in there where Corbin describes some of the components that made up the two respective railroads, but some of the details (to me) seem to have been lost in time.
Perhaps someone here can share some insight...

So let me just state a few things which I think are incumbent upon understanding the situation, someone can add or correct any of these assumptions:

  • 1850s-1880s settlements all wanted to be a part of the new railroad system, as it meant easier transportation and receiving/shipping of goods.  Being left with no rail line at all severely impaired the community.  This meant that people in town were willing to spend a lot of money to get a railroad to their town.
  • Railroad companies were willing to put in stations at set intervals to bring more traffic to the railroad, leaving a 20 mile stretch of line without any station at all actually also impaired the railroad if there were farms along the route.

Now to the questions...

  • Why were there so many in-corporations that changed every few years?  A lot of the changes are not listed, so it makes me wonder if they were all to bankruptcy? Or what?  I'm guessing that some of the incidents were the result of swindlers preying upon towns who were willing to throw cash to anyone who seemed like they could promise a railroad...and a lot of cash was being thrown around.
  • In the book, Corbin talks of some rivalry between the Wabash and CB&Q for new territory.  I'd be interested in hearing how some of this worked, as it appeared that railroads were started on behalf of other railroads with the sole purpose of being under them.  Was there a purpose for  this?  Federal law?
  • Why were there so many bankruptcies in this early industry?  Miscalculation of funds required to build a railroad?  Miscalculation of railroad usage?

A little more discussion on how the early financing worked would be interesting as well, I think.  From what I can see, it appears that a corporation is started, and then bonds sold to anyone who would buy them (based on a dollar-amount-per-mile figure that the railroad had come up with to support the building and creation of the railroad).  This this also include figures for purchase of the locomotives and rolling stock?  Or was it just trackage & stations?  Or even just trackage, and the stations would be supported by either the railroad or the town?

Finally, I guess it all culminates with the eventual (and somewhat rapid) downfall of the railroads, that in the early 1900s the Model T began to give anyone the ability to move goods and people easily, and therefore the decision to drive cattle or people to a larger town rather than wait on rail shipment/transportation (and possible tariffs) just offset the original usefulness and convenience of the railroad.

At any rate, I'm sure this group has people who are very knowledgeable in this subject, as always... :)

Cheers!

Jan Kohl
www.castlegraphics.com




__._,_.___

Posted by: Charlie Vlk <cvlk@comcast.net>



__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>