BRHSLIST
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: [CBQ] Re: Track oiling

To: "CBQ@yahoogroups.com" <CBQ@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [CBQ] Re: Track oiling
From: "John D. Mitchell, Jr." <cbqrr47@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-to: unknown
Delivered-to: archives@nauer.org
Delivered-to: mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1389734834; bh=T3DTtor8Oz867Q8xCtE6Y2GaGmNTcJkdPEE6EQbhl3s=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:To:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=iuNnPIzoQx1QxnX3vpgkRRrbVsl5em4HH0Lqn3k/FMTnCOUQ6I3ZQoXi8FCNQAJQDgdYoOOx10WroeceAg3o8ioqK8O+h9B2pQjj6BmAZ+TPF7PSR3UQsLeMysQxxi2KNi7JAKy7RUTibxocjQyCsmuGExfuUSgdiBSzrnLAGO4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=agHvoPsg2HdUVsVzUPLlSxk71+J1HClNKFqkahtbexLwTr2wusqqfJ00d10YCYtrSuKMT64FfcHoHEbkyIcDnmEi1qb8wCMKPO/0vdQwFAyRcKMmRgPZQeTFdlPfHZEv44H2/NUnGnzvJsMaEkT4K3hJ+VU3RApqXLntMhtwl4o=;
In-reply-to: <KGEBKGPLHMDMEJMKKJGOMELGNBAA.dave_lotz@bellsouth.net>
List-id: <CBQ.yahoogroups.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-list: list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com
References: <KGEBKGPLHMDMEJMKKJGOMELGNBAA.dave_lotz@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
Sender: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


I don't want to be jumped on but terms "angle bar'' and "joint bar" are both accepted terms for the same thing per the "Railway Track & Structures Cyclopedia" considered to be the "Bible" of railway engineering with joint bar being the preferred term in trade publications. I checked the AREA Manual (American Railway Engineering Association) and it's standards are for "joint bars". So you can called them either and be right.


On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:06 PM, Dave Lotz <Dave_Lotz@bellsouth.net> wrote:
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Re: Track oiling
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:15:30 -0700
From: Norm Metcalf mailto:normmetcalf@yahoo.com
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com


This reminds me of a safety poster done by CBQ's Tom Walker.  It showed two worried men pumping a handcar with a diesel tailgating them.  One of them something like "Are you sure you checked the lineup?".  I also witnessed (visually and on the radio) when a hi-railer got on the tracks, and then on a bridge with an oncoming train headed for them.  The operator was frantically calling them to back up and get off the tracks.  When they saw the train they put it in reverse and complied.  Norm Metcalf, Boulder Colorado

On 1/13/2014 7:36 AM, archie hayden wrote:
Hol, Thanks for bringing us up to speed on the motor cars.  Pun intended.  Since we are speaking of the motor cars that our fine brothers of the section were in charge of, old heads told me of several burial grounds along the right of way that harbored the remains of a wayward motor car who paid no attention to the lineups.  I did not dig there to validate the story but often wondered if it was that easy to "cover up" such an incident.  The only thing I ever dug up was a pot belly stove some section men told me about from the shelter at Lentner, Mo.  Lo and behold it was still there about a foot below the cinders.  Kind of rusty.  Archie also kind of rusty.
[snip]





__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>