| To: | <cbq@yahoogroups.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [CBQ] Rerouting EPB & TCZ on CGW |
| From: | Gerald Edgar <vje68@hotmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:29:13 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | archives@nauer.org |
| Delivered-to: | mailing list CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=lima; t=1291663862; bh=AfcX8zzGMUbEOV/BlQBIOxBRXZEfGI2y2syi0wEa0EA=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:Message-ID:To:Importance:In-Reply-To:References:X-OriginalArrivalTime:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BEETl9AbprnhGxa7207QyteLvKwBhz8nRc+4iMXW/jLpWLso7ldRUwdJCgq8WVB9vs4DkLWuw3zo/pSas7RjezNDqt3Op2XZaKaaSjVsvDNR2BxLju8g29KX2fQ6c32N |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=YxAnDkzNEyW6Ai9fOpPDZswuJ1MU7BAq6Hn/RbjoWEFATxQQIEcWYwEp7e20zwYwxVUlBVg0TmlwjakXjYNb2KLvTUMzp9Zfwq7yu+3+8te8T0gMH15JC7QYMdEghpMa; |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <3156E6E4-B09C-4361-A4C7-D83AE0CB5059@sprynet.com> |
| List-id: | <CBQ.yahoogroups.com> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <mailto:CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> |
| Mailing-list: | list CBQ@yahoogroups.com; contact CBQ-owner@yahoogroups.com |
| References: | <BAY113-W173F54F7A3C3E3F63D95B2B82B0@phx.gbl>,<3156E6E4-B09C-4361-A4C7-D83AE0CB5059@sprynet.com> |
| Reply-to: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
| Sender: | CBQ@yahoogroups.com |
The entire line inc. (Winston tunnel) from Oelwein to St. Charles, IL was in
use til a yr after C&NW absorption of CGW (absorbed in "68 so line abandoned
"69?) I have a booklet at home on the tunnel (reputedly haunted & also full of
poison ivy at one end). "Five motors" (Q E units) would not have been a
problem exhaust-wise as CGW regularly ran up to 6-8 older F units on this line
esp. when pulling a train of meat-laden reefers. But then they had dropped
passenger service by late 60's so only exposed people would have been conductor
& read brakeman but there too a saving grace was CGW ran 150+ car long
freights. I.E. engines long out of the tunnel before the Pennsy style 'cabin'
cabooses went in.
Gerald
To: CBQ@yahoogroups.com
From: mmatalis@sprynet.com
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:18:28 -0600
Subject: Re: [CBQ] Rerouting EPB & TCZ on CGW
The CGW tunnel did not have a central ventilation shaft. I've seen
photographs of it's west end showing a building called a ventilating
house, so they may be just pulled air in one end out and out the
other. The photos date from 1966 and the building looks like it had
been out of service for quite some time.
Thank you kindly,
Michael Matalis
Downers Grove IL
mmatalis@sprynet.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CBQ/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
CBQ-digest@yahoogroups.com
CBQ-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CBQ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CBQ] Rerouting EPB & TCZ on CGW, Michael Matalis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CBQ] RE: print your own Heavyweight Q Decals, Gerald Edgar |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CBQ] Rerouting EPB & TCZ on CGW, Michael Matalis |
| Next by Thread: | [CBQ] Milk, qutlx1 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |